itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,360
Rocket-footed kolarov said:itisrising said:Rocket-footed kolarov said:Mata suits Chelsea better, and works well playing alongside Oscar and Hazard with 1 striker up front, mata provides the extra goal threat and also means RDM does n't have to play Fat Frank.
Nasri suits us better, the only problem at the moment is his lack of winner's attitude, everytime a sign a quality midfielder on Fifa 13 he moans about being replaced, a reflection of his real life counter part. Man up you daft ****, practise your free kicks and stop being a wimp in challenges all the time. I though he started the season better than Silva so lets hope keeps up the good work.
No Nasri doesn't suit us better. Had Mata been playing here, I guarentee you wouln't be saying that. Nasri isn't very good and at the end of the day was a bad signing. Apart from the odd glimpse, he has been poor. Nasri isn't world-class, Mata is.
Mata scored 1 more goal and made 4 more assists but he also played 3 more league games and was his teams main creative outlet, Nasri was n't. Mancini wants to play 2 forwards and 2 false wingers, Nasri is better suited to the inside forward position than Mata and Like I said the only problem with Nasri is his mentality, when has Mata not looked arse. Nasri was close to Mata's stats last season when he was n't at his best.
Nasri doesn't sort our style. We are a team that scores plenty of goals from Counter-attack football. Nasri lacks the pace to make any sort of difference in those sorts of positions. He takes too many touches on the ball to only play the simple pass. The word to sum up Nasri's time here is unspectacular. Mata came from a different country and immideatly found his feet. Nasri has been in the Premier League for a fair few years and still we are waiting for him to make his impact. Technically and Mentally, Mata is a better player than Nasri.