Those who think there's no agenda need to read this...

[friend]

*cough* Balotelli *cough*

And your point is...?

Another wrong decision, surely?

Derry shouldn't have been upheld. Balotelli should have been punished.

 

[Dirty Harry]

*cough* Balotelli *cough*

And your point is...?

That a pretty obvious "assault" on Song by a City player has gone unpunished. That really is "corrupt", isn't it?

I take it if there's any retrospective action you'll take that back then ?

 

[MCFC BOB]

And your point is...?

That a pretty obvious "assault" on Song by a City player has gone unpunished. That really is "corrupt", isn't it?

I take it if there's any retrospective action you'll take that back then ?

The FA have confirmed there won't be, but never mind, we can't let that get in the way of a "THE FA ARE CORRUPT!"-athon.

 

[Dirty Harry]

That a pretty obvious "assault" on Song by a City player has gone unpunished. That really is "corrupt", isn't it?

I take it if there's any retrospective action you'll take that back then ?

The FA have confirmed there won't be, but never mind, we can't let that get in the way of a "THE FA ARE CORRUPT!"-athon.

Well quite clearly something's not right then as there should have been, most fans acknowledge the fact it was a straight red.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

*cough* Balotelli *cough*

And your point is...?

Another wrong decision, surely?

Derry shouldn't have been upheld. Balotelli should have been punished.

I think Balotelli would have been punished if we'd still been in the title race.

 

[cyprustavern]

i prefer the word corrupt as opposed to agenda...agenda has too many connotations with tin foil helmets/underground bunkers etc



...good old fashioned power , corruption and lies is what it is (although now marios escaped retrospective banning , along with the `newcastle pen` it proves everything is above board and legitimate doesnt it?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

*cough* Balotelli *cough*

And your point is...?

Another wrong decision, surely?

Derry shouldn't have been upheld. Balotelli should have been punished.

The rules are that if one of the officials saw a coming together but didn't take acction at the time then there is no retrospective action. Even Atkinson couldn't get away with lying about that.

 

[Neville Kneville]

And your point is...?

Another wrong decision, surely?

Derry shouldn't have been upheld. Balotelli should have been punished.

I think Balotelli would have been punished if we'd still been in the title race.

Absofuckinglutely he would. As has every City player.

This is proof of the influence of Baconchops & Harry etc at the top table. They don't need a favour now so it's ok to let him off.

 

[mat]

Ballotelli has served his. Purpose. Deflecting any criticism of bent officials over shocking decisions at the weekend.

 

[MCFC BOB]

I take it if there's any retrospective action you'll take that back then ?

The FA have confirmed there won't be, but never mind, we can't let that get in the way of a "THE FA ARE CORRUPT!"-athon.

Well quite clearly something's not right then as there should have been, most fans acknowledge the fact it was a straight red.

That's right, but the people in the chairs - and the referee, who is definitely corrupt - have decided it's not. But the FA DEFINITELY hate us and only us.