jma said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
jma said:
How does selling 48,000 tickets for each game give any impression as to whether there is the demand to fill a 60/70/80 thousand capacity stadium?
I think that it gives you an indication that it is more likely than if they hadn't sold 48,000 tickets.
Almost every home game for the last three seasons has sold out, or been very close to selling out.
How does this scheme prove that there is 'extra demand' beyond the evidence provided by normal games, sold by normal measures?
Well, I'll answer it myself then.
This scheme gives absolutely no evidence as to whether there is demand to fill a significantly expanded stadium. At a push, and if you were being extremely generous, you might be able to construct an argument that says as it has allowed none members to buy tickets, it shows that a few thousand. non members are interested in buying tickets and therefore there might be demand for a 55,000 stadium.
But, that is nonsense really and not even something the club would dare put forward as a reason for this rip off scheme.
It is a reasoning, an excuse plucked out of thin air,without evidence, by a few fans who are desperate to make excuses for every rip off scheme that the club come out with. Based on no realistic evidence whatsoever.
The aims of this little scheme are two fold and have nothing to do with 'gauging' demand for a huge new stadium expansion.
They are:
a) first and foremost, to squeeze significantly more money out of City fans for seats that already, before the price increases associated with this scheme, are sold to Blue members at some ridiculous prices.
and
b) to find a snide way to make the tickets available to the sort of Johnny Come Lately, non City supporting numpties that filled the ground at the Real Madrid home game, by limiting the time that they were on sale to the people (members) who would usually buy them and excluding some of those members, those who cannot spare £250 up front, from buying them. Filling the stadium with these sort of numpties is much more appealing to a cynical numbers man as they spend far more money on tat and are more gloryhunting clowns added to 'the brand'. That it excludes some loyal fans and also totally changes the terms for which many City fans have bought (yes, for cold hard cash) membership and the already scandelous 'Match Ticket Priority' scheme is not something that troubles them.
Defend that sort of cynical ripping off of loyal City fans if you want. But come up with a reason that is more grounded in reality than "it tests demand for stadium expansion".<br /><br />-- Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:38 pm --<br /><br />
gordondaviesmoustache said:
jma said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I think that it gives you an indication that it is more likely than if they hadn't sold 48,000 tickets.
Almost every home game for the last three seasons has sold out, or been very close to selling out.
How does this scheme prove that there is 'extra demand' beyond the evidence provided by normal games, sold by normal measures?
Have you ever knowingly been subject to any form of sarcasm?
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. Sarcasm is hard to separate from certain posting styles. Thanks for the sarcastic contribution though, if that's what it was.