Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
shocked he called it secs after it hit 90 mins
shocked he called it secs after it hit 90 mins
Unless you had a bet on it finishing 2 -7In a good way? :)
The injury time when we need to score and the opposition doesn't is based on one game.
You are using very small numbers and there is no statistical significance due to it, and ignored all multiple variables and zero benchmark comparisons.
Or even us scoring 7, or a combination of other bets coming in.Unless you had a bet on it finishing 2 -7
(I didn't)
I'd like a rule where if a team like these who have wasted time constantly,but are only one goal behind coming into 90 mins, then the other team get offered the chance to either play the added time or no time at all. It really doesn't seem fair that a team who have offered nothing in a game get a punchers chance for 10 minutes or so.At Bournemouth on Saturday, I was surprised only six minutes were added after all the subs, then there was a further delay due to a possible head injury which is why six became eight. It was a very long eight minutes!