Time to Ban E Cigs

[IanBishopsHaircut]

Read this from a public health scientist

<a class="postlink" href="http://nicotinepolicy.net/gerry-stimson/2396-statement-on-today-s-publication-of-the-world-health-organisation-who-report-on-e-cigarettes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://nicotinepolicy.net/gerry-stimson ... cigarettes</a>

 

[Mike D]

E-cigarettes saved my life and ensured I am here to see my kids grow up

Come on that's just taking things a bit far nobody knows what damage they do and its just plain ignorance to pretend they have medical benefits .

 

[IanBishopsHaircut]

E-cigarettes saved my life and ensured I am here to see my kids grow up

Come on that's just taking things a bit far nobody knows what damage they do and its just plain ignorance to pretend they have medical benefits .

Before ecigs I was inhaling cancerous smoke into my lungs and had a cough like I was at deaths door

Now, after two years on ecigs according to my doctor I have lungs akin to me never having smoked at all

I'd say that was a 'medical benefit' wouldn't you?

Cigarettes kill

 

[dazdon]

It's all a load of bollox.

That's about all the edict deserves.

 

[RP2]

I was all for the smoking ban, as one person's choice to smoke affected another persons health if they were close by.

Banning e-cigs would be fucking pathetic. As much of a possible danger to the smoker is, it is THEIR CHOICE. It does not affect somebody who doesn't smoke them.

If e-cigs are to be banned, then next they should ban alcohol, crisps and burgers.

Cunts.

I'm a non-smoker BTW.

 

[IanBishopsHaircut]

My thoughts exactly

 

[Why Always Ste]

Don't see the problem with them.

However, Go somewhere designated and blow your smoke into other smokers personal space.

There are too many people on this planet anyway, kill yourself prematurely (your doing the planet a favour)

They could be the healthiest thing around, I personally don't want that blown near me, onto my clothing or anything.

 

[andyhinch]

I was all for the smoking ban, as one person's choice to smoke affected another persons health if they were close by.

Banning e-cigs would be fucking pathetic. As much of a possible danger to the smoker is, it is THEIR CHOICE. It does not affect somebody who doesn't smoke them.

If e-cigs are to be banned, then next they should ban alcohol, crisps and burgers.

Cunts.

I'm a non-smoker BTW.

Ban them all, it would save me a fortune:)

 

[kinkysleftfoot]

The big tobacco companies spent millions trying to prove these things didn't work and were harmful, they could find no evidence whatsoever, it's only recently they have started to come on board

I welcome regulation as it would get rid of all the cowboys on the markets etc, but to
ban something that's saving people's lives and is the best quitting aid on the market is just plan stupid

I spend a lot money getting my liquids tested in government approved UK laboratories for content and quality, we now have doctors sending people to the shops.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

E-cigarettes saved my life and ensured I am here to see my kids grow up

Come on that's just taking things a bit far nobody knows what damage they do and its just plain ignorance to pretend they have medical benefits .

Before ecigs I was inhaling cancerous smoke into my lungs and had a cough like I was at deaths door

Now, after two years on ecigs according to my doctor I have lungs akin to me never having smoked at all

I'd say that was a 'medical benefit' wouldn't you?

Cigarettes kill

Your doctor is a liar then.