"The ‘shortest’ game of the Premier League season so far was Leeds United’s 2-2 home draw against West Ham in January. The ball was in play for just 42 minutes and 12 seconds of play – or 42.3% of available match time. Spectators at Elland Road didn’t even get to watch one half of football, let alone two.
..........
You genuinely would have had enough time to put the kettle on while watching Everton taking throw-ins against Manchester City on New Year’s Eve. The Toffees took an incredible 51 seconds per throw in their 1-1 draw against Pep Guardiola’s side."
Needs addressing. Remind referees and players that you can be booked for time wasting even if the first minute, non head injuries should be treated off field if safe to do so or very near to the edge, play acting is disrespectful to colleagues and teammates who may actually be injured, and in an era when us paying fans are expected to cough up more and more season on season (in the midst of a financial crisis where many are facing tough choices over food and housing bills, let alone how they can afford to show their support), that pushing it to the extremes of not even seeing the ball in play for 45mins is akin to us purchasing a product not fit for purpose that, regardless of whether you win, lose or draw, is not giving the very basic principle of football of watching a full game of sport.
Plus none of that even mentions the time from waiting on var decisions.
I'd even go to the extreme of invoking fair play penalties. Have the ball in play less that 55 mins over a season and get a points reduction. Does that disadvantage the poorer teams? Maybe, but so what. This is a spectator sport for most and about time we were put first.