To the Rags who say we are buying success....

123abcd said:
Manph said:
When United floated on the stock market & became a football business they sold their soul to the Devil. And on Sunday, he came to collect!

JM


haha this!

And if it's that easy with money, why hasn't Real Madrid won everything under the sun in the last 10 years?
Where have you been in the last 10 (or 11) years?

2001, 2003, 2007, 2008 La Liga Champions = Real Madrid
2000, 2002 Champions League winners = Real Madrid
2011 Copa del Rey winners = Real Madrid

If City achieve this in the next 11 years it would be absolutely UNBELIEVABLE! and I think they'll win La Liga this season.
 
We have broken no rules.

If you won the lottery, would you buy your Ferrari one wheel at a time?

Gradually convincing myself to let the sad losers say what they want. It is not affecting the players or our brilliant manager.

More to the point, I think beating United 6-1 at the swamp is priceless - or a as a minimum worth every penny our gratious owner has chosen to spend of his own money on lucky old us.

Surely worse to be up to your neck in debt, bank rolled on the back of the fall of the Soviet Union or have tonnes of cash to spend on players but blindly refusing to reinvest on the basis of your egotistical crusade that you can win the league with a load of teenagers cherry picked from across Europe!
 
Jordie said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
It;s not just rags thinking this...

Did anyone happen to see Dan Lobb on Daybreak this morning...Only happened to flick it on as John Stapleton was on.."City buying success" were his exact words...Stapleton replied "Yes-but we have to buy the right players Dan". His face was a picture...For those of you that don't know him he is the ex sky sports news presenter...Fucking cock...

Dan-Lobb_280_957139a.jpg
Proper blue John. Seen him in the ground having a drink before the match.

Your not wrong...He was stood 4 rows in front of me...Juss one of the boys...Was that his son with the long hair and grungy beard next to him?....
 
M18CTID said:
While I've no great love for Everton and Newcastle (I don't mind Villa) I couldn't agree more with this. I've never begrudged any club for spending money donated to them by a rich owner or money borrowed from outside sources as United did which largely funded Ferguson's spending sprees in the late 1980's (self-sufficient club my arse!). No other City fan that I know of used to moan about it either. Sure, we were perhaps a little envious of other clubs spending big money and in United's case we'd sooner they didn't spend big money because we want them to lose every game but outright bitterness, jealousy, and moral outrage? Not a chance.

And this is why football fans of all clubs moaning about this kind of thing should man the fuck up and get on with it. As for the moral outrage from opposition fans, not only should they learn about their own club's history but just as importantly these people should remember that at least 99.99% of football fans didn't pull out their moral compass when choosing which club to support so it renders their point completely and utterly invalid.

Anyway, great post by the way petrusha and good to see you back posting on here.

Cheers. I've mainly been posting on the Vegas thread of late, but not under this username until Ric kindly changed it for me the other day. But in the afterglow of a 6-1 derby win, how can anyone not want to post as much as time allows?! :)

I agree with everything you say, and when I listen to the people who condemn us, I don't hear them slate teams who've made their way up to the PL only on the basis of the benefactor model. Fulham, Wigan, Blackburn, Bolton, Stoke and so on - a huge chunk of the league wouldn't be there but for this, yet no one says a word about that.

I've watched City for 36 years now, and for near on the first quarter of a century of that, we had clueless owners who put nothing or next to nothing in. Others benefitted from investment during that time and prospered - we slid to the lowest point in our history. Now the boot's on the other foot.

I didn't complain about it back then and nor will I feel guilty about it now. All part of football's rich tapestry as far as I'm concerned.
 
Chippy_boy said:
Just remind them their wage bill is higher than ours (£250m vs £230m).

Then you can tell them no-one in the right mind would join the rags and players only go there for the money :-)
Although wages are a relevant and often overlooked point which actually correlate far better with success than transfer fees do, the figures you've just listed are a fantasy. According the last accounts for 2010, our wages were £133.3m and theirs £131.7m - which have risen to £152.9m for 2011. Ours will have risen also and will still be higher.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.