Absolutely. That would be my reason for home use.Might just be me, but I think there's a big difference in having one at home as you describe to walking round tooled up as a daily norm.
Yes, although seems like a very dumb thing to tryDo criminals ever rob houses for firearms?
Oh to live in a country so free you need a gun to feel safe when shopping, the greatest country on earth.Absolutely. That would be my reason for home use.
Friend of mine always carries his with him when he goes to the Mall (concealed of course) and has one locked in his glove compartment in his car.
Other stated have different laws
You can only wishOh to live in a country so free you need a gun to feel safe when shopping, the greatest country on earth.
The scariest thing for me when I lived out there was I turned down a street when I got lost in North Carolina and walking up the street was a load of KKK, I spun the car round and smoked the wheels.You can only wish
Any country that has a thing called a circle K convenience store desrves all it gets...Other countries have lots of guns but not the mass shootings. Something very wrong with America I imagine a lot of it is to do with mental health issues
Other countries that have lots of guns still have fairly strict regulations about them, as far as I'm aware though. I think the mental health argument is just something used by gun nuts to try and deflect blame. It's not as if plenty of people in the UK don't have mental health problems.Other countries have lots of guns but not the mass shootings. Something very wrong with America I imagine a lot of it is to do with mental health issues
Take away the last 11 words and is it any different in the UK?But if you're looking for factors beyond just the guns themselves, then it'd be worth looking at the fact that the US has the level of wealth inequality of a developing nation. That is typically correlated with a whole host of social problems, including levels of violence. Add to that their horrendous prison system that basically removes any opportunity to become a success legally once you've been convicted of one crime, driving people into a life of crime (massive generalization, I know), which in the States, is going to involve guns by definition.
Possibly, but my point was more to compare the US to countries that manage to have access to guns without the high rates of gun violence and murder. Obviously there's no country on the planet that manages to have the levels of gun ownership that America does. But somewhere like Norway has less than 10% of the murder rate per capita as America, and they have relatively high gun ownership by global standards. Serbia has 40 guns per 100 people and has a similar murder rate to the UK (6 times less than America). Finland, Canada, Iceland, Switzerland, there are plenty of countries where guns are relatively accessible. But it's fairly well established that both poverty in absolute terms and inequality in society lead to higher rates of all sorts of crime including violent crime and murder. And the US has managed to create this unique combination of high inequality and insane levels of gun ownership. I'd argue that removing either one of those factors would improve things. Removing both would be even better.Take away the last 11 words and is it any different in the UK?
No probably not. Definitely a discussion for another thread as I think we should follow other countries standards on this (Norway). Their re offend rate is about 30% vs our 65%Take away the last 11 words and is it any different in the UK?
I agree inequality gun ownership and lack of controls on guns all play a part but Mass shoutings specifically seem to have something to do with mental health issues or something else in American culture. Of course it’s wrong to go around shooting people as part of say a robbery etc but I can see how that links to crime in general inequality. Just logically mass shooting just seem so pointless and and the act of desperate and mentally unstable ill people. Even with all our problems with mental health we don’t get mass stabbing. Countries with lots of guns like America admittedly they have less and more controls don’t have mass shootings like America. Not an expert on third world countries and guns but less prosperous countries with less law and order and also lots of guns don’t have mass shooting. Yes they have less guns but I would guess they have less ability to do checks or deal with other issues but they to don’t have mass shootings like thisPossibly, but my point was more to compare the US to countries that manage to have access to guns without the high rates of gun violence and murder. Obviously there's no country on the planet that manages to have the levels of gun ownership that America does. But somewhere like Norway has less than 10% of the murder rate per capita as America, and they have relatively high gun ownership by global standards. Serbia has 40 guns per 100 people and has a similar murder rate to the UK (6 times less than America). Finland, Canada, Iceland, Switzerland, there are plenty of countries where guns are relatively accessible. But it's fairly well established that both poverty in absolute terms and inequality in society lead to higher rates of all sorts of crime including violent crime and murder. And the US has managed to create this unique combination of high inequality and insane levels of gun ownership. I'd argue that removing either one of those factors would improve things. Removing both would be even better.
It has been announced that body cam footage from the five officers that have been charged with the Death of Tyre Nichols will be released today at 7pm EST.
It's going to be a long dark weekend for the United States.
Reports from the people that have already seen the footage say its AWFUL. I've never seen so many people try to get in front of a video being released to try and lower the temperature of the moment.
Heart breaks for my country, especially when I have no idea how to help it.