hilts
Well-Known Member
They seem to have created this narrative that doesn't accept that someone who earns more doesn't pay more in tax anyway (this sentence possibly has one to many "doesn't" in it). Regardless of whether I paid for my own degree or not, if I go on to earn £100k a year, I will have more than paid it back in the additional taxes I pay compared to someone on £20k a year. But yeah, the other issue is that we're constantly hearing about how robots are going to take our jobs. And the last time we faced a similar threat during automation, the answer was public education. It's almost certain that increased levels of education will be the answer again. Those middle-skilled jobs are the ones that are going to disappear, replaced with algorithms and robots that can do the job better. Already computer science graduates are replacing those with degrees in finance in investment banking. The highly-skilled and creative jobs will be where the future is. People like to laugh at media studies, but robots aren't going to be replacing scriptwriters any time soon.
So you are saying that a 15k a year bloke/woman should pay for your degree because you will earn 100k and pay a lot of tax. So you clear 60k approx a year for your working life let's say 40 years. 2.4 million quid but you don't want to pay 50 grand you want the guy clearing 13/14k a year to do it because you pay tax.
I hear that rich people should pay more tax to help out the little guy and if they say well I pay plenty of tax they are selfish cunts but you want a poor guy to subsidies you because you will pay plenty of tax.
These morals just get more confusing.