They are such a badly run club it's untrue. When Pochettino was the manager, he took them to the CL final and came 2nd in the league behind Leicester. Whilst I don't particularly rate him, if he takes Spurs to the CL final you do NOT sack him a few months later. They should've stuck with him.
Anyway, the way Spurs played with Pochettino was fast, flowing and attacking football. If you are going to sack him, you should bring someone in who plays a similar type of football to maybe get more out of the players. They brought in Mourinho who is renown for building robotic, defensive teams. You couldn't have picked a bigger gap in style! Mind he took them to a cup final against us and given what he'd achieved, they should've backed him. Instead they sacked him. If you pick Mourinho as your manager, you back him and his record tells you he will win trophies. Why pick him and then not back him?
They then went for the ultra negative Wolves coach, a side known for being dull, not scoring and not doing anything particularly exciting. He also played a different style to Mourinho and Pochettino! Conte came in and again played a different style to the previous manager - there's a pattern! I've not even mentioned that guy who got sacked for being just awful.
They need to decide what type of football they want to play and go and pick a manager who plays that style. They then need to get the players in to play that style. If they keep hiring and firing they will end up with an unhappy squad of players who don't want to play for the manager, want out and won't play to their potential.
They've got some brilliant players and this season they should've been pushing us for the title, but they wasted another year. It's astonishing that Kane and Son want to stay there knowing they aren't going to win anything.