Trayvon Martin

BoyBlue_1985 said:
didactic said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
You cant see why they gave Israel to the Jewish people after WW2, really you cant see why????
It was gone about the wrong way without a doubt but 6 million people murdered during a war and you cant see the reason for Israel

Not only can I not see why I believe that Israel is a terror state that should never have been born. Here we go again with the holocaust card.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJs5BxBoqZ8[/youtube]

Norman Finkelstein

Norman Gary Finkelstein (born December 8, 1953) is an American political scientist, activist and author. His primary fields of research are the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the politics of the Holocaust, an interest motivated by the experiences of his parents who are Jewish Holocaust survivors. He is a graduate of Binghamton University and received his Ph.D in Political Science from Princeton University. He has held faculty positions at Brooklyn College, Rutgers University, Hunter College, New York University, and, most recently, DePaul University, where he was an assistant professor from 2001 to 2007.

WTF are you going on about
The truth, fool.
 
Lucky13 said:
BWTAC said:
Lucky13 said:
Enlighten us on what your final solution would be.

8xprbd.jpg

[bigimg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-m-ruRXFUyIM/Tb_5Yuw6MxI/AAAAAAAACTo/o213WgW92H4/s1600/swa.jpg[/bigimg]

You may want to be careful of accusing people of something as serious as being a Nazi. Jokes are jokes but there are lines.<br /><br />-- Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:10 pm --<br /><br />
BoyBlue_1985 said:
WTF are you going on about

Did you even listen to the youtube link?
 
didactic said:
Lucky13 said:
BWTAC said:

[bigimg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-m-ruRXFUyIM/Tb_5Yuw6MxI/AAAAAAAACTo/o213WgW92H4/s1600/swa.jpg[/bigimg]

You may want to be careful of accusing people of something as serious as being a Nazi. Jokes are jokes but there are lines.

-- Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:10 pm --

BoyBlue_1985 said:
WTF are you going on about

Did you even listen to the youtube link?

I cant, infact i didnt even know there was one
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
I cant, infact i didnt even know there was one

Your work firewall may block certain sites youtube included.

Transcript

(Jewish girl) - During your speech you made a lot of references to Jewish people as well as certain people in the audience, not Jewish people in general, but especially in the audience - to Nazis. That is extremely offensive to certain people who are German and also extremely offensive to those who actually suffered under Nazi rule. *starts crying*



(Dr Norman Finkelstein) - I don't respect that any more, I really don't. I don't like and I don't respect the crocodile tears (interruptions) the crocodile tears (clapping and cries from audience) listen sir, allow me to finish

I don't like to play to a foreign audience the Holocaust card but since now I feel compelled to - my late father was in Auschwitz, my late mother ... please shut-up (applause) my late father was in Auschwitz my late mother was in Mgdonevice concentration camp - every single member of my family on both sides were exterminated, both my parents were in the Warsaw Ghetto

They taught me and my two siblings that I will not be silenced by Israel over their crimes against Palestinians.

I consider nothing more despicable than to use their suffering and their martyrdom to try to justify the torture the brutalization and the demolition of homes commits against the Palestinians

I refuse any more to be intimidated to be browbeaten by the tears, if you had any heart in you, you would be crying for the Palestinians.
 
Interesting editorial here-
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/nejame-angela-corey/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/n ... index.html</a>
 
Lucky13 said:
BWTAC said:
Lucky13 said:
Enlighten us on what your final solution would be.

8xprbd.jpg

[bigimg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-m-ruRXFUyIM/Tb_5Yuw6MxI/AAAAAAAACTo/o213WgW92H4/s1600/swa.jpg[/bigimg]

Offtopic slightly, but did you know there were actually black KKK members? Not just a small number either, estimated 20,000, maybe even more:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.kkklan.com/negroklan.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.kkklan.com/negroklan.htm</a>
 
Bigga said:
prairiemoon said:
Interesting editorial here-
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/nejame-angela-corey/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/n ... index.html</a>

So, what have you deduced from the article, then???
Interesting? That was just about the most boring article I've ever fucking read. It takes me back to reading Catcher in the Rye. No fucking point until the last two paragraphs (twenty pages in the case of Catcher in the Rye), and even then a shit one which says well, look at the woman's case history, she got a black woman 20 years for fuck all, so she's now trying to cosy up to the African-American community by seeking justice for Trayvon... She both hates and loves black people... Or maybe she's a lawyer seeking high profile cases and money... Remind me, never ever, read anything posted by prariemoon again, he's got his head so far up his arse he thinks this article is interesting!

I think we can surmise interesting in his view is 'throw up anything I come across than even slightly tries to discredit the Trayvon case and then call it interesting.'
 
Skashion said:
Bigga said:
prairiemoon said:
Interesting editorial here-
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/nejame-angela-corey/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/opinion/n ... index.html</a>

So, what have you deduced from the article, then???
Interesting? That was just about the most boring article I've ever fucking read. It takes me back to reading Catcher in the Rye. No fucking point until the last two paragraphs (twenty pages in the case of Catcher in the Rye), and even then a shit one which says well, look at the woman's case history, she got a black woman 20 years for fuck all, so she's now trying to cosy up to the African-American community by seeking justice for Trayvon... She both hates and loves black people... Or maybe she's a lawyer seeking high profile cases and money... Remind me, never ever, read anything posted by prariemoon again, he's got his head so far up his arse he thinks this article is interesting!

I think we can surmise interesting in his view is 'throw up anything I come across than even slightly tries to discredit the Trayvon case and then call it interesting.'

I am surprised it has taken some posters this long to realise it.
 
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.
 
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.

10rommu.jpg
 
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.

I think here you are more defending the mans cause not because of the facts but because of his race. He is a racist not because he is white but because he before all this exposed himself and his racist leanings on various forums and websites. Why do you continue to ignore those facts? If I post about my hatred of white people and how they are all thugs and criminals and two years later you read "didactic shoots unarmed white youth" would you completely ignore the past facts?

You are not being objective you are being biased as it is rather clear you believe there is some "white persecution" taking place in America. Not every white man is innocent just as not every black man is innocent. Take the evidence of each individual case and judge based on that.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
didactic said:
Bigga said:
I never said you were. I said you make yourself look foolish to be 'anti' something when previously seemingly 'pro' when it didn't affect you. That's stupidity and clouds any opinion you may have on the subject of racism.

Fine, you 'did your time'... on here. Is it a lesson learned in Life? should be the question.

Anyway, what's done is done.

Im not racist Bigga this is the internet many things are lost in translation and you have to remember that. Because I grew up around all different races we are very comfortable about joking around with race and using stereotypes something which does not translate well on an internet forum. That comment I posted was actually made by an Asian lady who was in my house along with other friends watching the game that night. This again you do not see as all you see are the comments and that can be seen as racist. I apologised even before my ban and did state all this but it was still deserving of a ban so I was banned.

I am not an Anti-Semite Ska I just do not see the reason for Israel and its being[/size=150].


You cant see why they gave Israel to the Jewish people after WW2, really you cant see why????
It was gone about the wrong way without a doubt but 6 million people murdered during a war and you cant see the reason for Israel
[/quote]

The Congolese lost double the amount of people under Belgian rule, and they didn't get an autonomous independent state, until many years after, so showing bias for one group for their sufferings over another is nonsense. Also, the Arabs toiled a lot during the war too.

There have been other people who have suffered far worse than the Jews during the holocaust, but got nothing.
 
Unknown_Genius said:
The Congolese lost double the amount of people under Belgian rule, and they didn't get an autonomous independent state, until many years after, so showing bias for one group for their sufferings over another is nonsense. Also, the Arabs toiled a lot during the war too.

There have been other people who have suffered far worse than the Jews during the holocaust, but got nothing.

Careful you are not allowed to say anything or you will be called an anti semite.
 
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.

You see,i'm clearly old fashioned and a bit set in my ways,but whenever I hear a white guy talking in a derogatory manner about black people,and he calls them 'niggers',then I invariably come to the conclusion that he is racist.
It's a simplistic formula,I grant you,but one that has served me well so far.
 
didactic said:
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.

I think here you are more defending the mans cause not because of the facts but because of his race. He is a racist not because he is white but because he before all this exposed himself and his racist leanings on various forums and websites. Why do you continue to ignore those facts? If I post about my hatred of white people and how they are all thugs and criminals and two years later you read "didactic shoots unarmed white youth" would you completely ignore the past facts?

You are not being objective you are being biased as it is rather clear you believe there is some "white persecution" taking place in America. Not every white man is innocent just as not every black man is innocent. Take the evidence of each individual case and judge based on that.

Fuck off, that's exactly what I'm doing. Oh hell, the irony is getting very thick.<br /><br />-- Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:12 am --<br /><br />
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.

You see,i'm clearly old fashioned and a bit set in my ways,but whenever I hear a white guy talking in a derogatory manner about black people,and he calls them 'niggers',then I invariably come to the conclusion that he is racist.
It's a simplistic formula,I grant you,but one that has served me well so far.
Source?
 
prairiemoon said:
No, you guys are right. It's all so simple. Obviously, the white guy is a racist who went out with the motive of killing an unarmed black teenage male. Couldn't be more cut and dry.

No ones motives should be questioned. Anyone involved with the prosecution is certainly above reproach and clearly has only the best of intentions.


You're blind baby. You're blind to the facts.

And you won't see them when they're right here in front of you, because you're twisted and biased.

Now the story is about the donated money. It's getting ridiculous.
Is it a fact that the story you posted was interesting?

I think it's clear from his MySpace account with his rants about Mexicans that he expects certain racial groups to be more likely to commit crimes. Was it this which led him to follow Trayvon Martin? I cannot possibly say, although his record of ringing the police about black suspects isn't exactly in his favour either, and I certainly hear coons on the tape:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSG84WeaiuM[/youtube]

However, is it a possibility? It's more than a possibility in my opinion. Is Trayvon dead because Zimmerman engaged in racial profiling? It could well be.

I'd like to see these facts that are in front of me that I've missed. Please enlighten me.

I believe the story is actually about perjury. I believe, that's been a crime for some time now, even in Florida.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top