Trayvon Martin

dazdon said:
Josh Blue said:
dazdon said:
Does this sound like the post of an EDL supporter then?

You should be ashamed of yourself for being so idiotic.

Are you a Sheep?

I'm not going to scroll through your posts.

I know it and so do you.

Am I sheep? Coming from the guy who refuses to question the word of the court..

So even though this historic post from mine shows me not to be a follower of the EDL...your warped mind fills in imaginary gaps?

Asute as a kick in the balls.

You can't read.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
didactic said:
The insensitivity shown by some posters about the death of a 17 year old is shocking some of the jokes are down right evil.

Maybe you could quote a couple of 'down right evil' jokes for me, so that we can avoid upsetting your delicate sensitivities in future?
And maybe tell me how many joke-related fatalities there have been recently?


It is well known that a contingent of the Royal Norfolk Regiment managed to hold off a Panzer division on the outskirts of Dunkirk for twenty four hours by the continual telling of knock knock jokes. The corporal who translated them into German was awarded the Military Cross.
 
sweynforkbeard said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
didactic said:
The insensitivity shown by some posters about the death of a 17 year old is shocking some of the jokes are down right evil.

Maybe you could quote a couple of 'down right evil' jokes for me, so that we can avoid upsetting your delicate sensitivities in future?
And maybe tell me how many joke-related fatalities there have been recently?


It is well known that a contingent of the Royal Norfolk Regiment managed to hold off a Panzer division on the outskirts of Dunkirk for twenty four hours by the continual telling of knock knock jokes. The corporal who translated them into German was awarded the Military Cross.

Fuck off. Is that true?
 
mcmanus said:
sweynforkbeard said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Maybe you could quote a couple of 'down right evil' jokes for me, so that we can avoid upsetting your delicate sensitivities in future?
And maybe tell me how many joke-related fatalities there have been recently?


It is well known that a contingent of the Royal Norfolk Regiment managed to hold off a Panzer division on the outskirts of Dunkirk for twenty four hours by the continual telling of knock knock jokes. The corporal who translated them into German was awarded the Military Cross.

Fuck off. Is that true?


doh-homer-simpson-doh.jpg
 
Bigga said:
mcmanus said:
sweynforkbeard said:
It is well known that a contingent of the Royal Norfolk Regiment managed to hold off a Panzer division on the outskirts of Dunkirk for twenty four hours by the continual telling of knock knock jokes. The corporal who translated them into German was awarded the Military Cross.

Fuck off. Is that true?


doh-homer-simpson-doh.jpg

LOL
 
Bigga said:
mcmanus said:
sweynforkbeard said:
It is well known that a contingent of the Royal Norfolk Regiment managed to hold off a Panzer division on the outskirts of Dunkirk for twenty four hours by the continual telling of knock knock jokes. The corporal who translated them into German was awarded the Military Cross.

Fuck off. Is that true?


doh-homer-simpson-doh.jpg


:-)

Fuck off. Sweynforkbeard having the craic. Caught ya.
 
mcmanus said:
Bigga said:
mcmanus said:
Fuck off. Is that true?


doh-homer-simpson-doh.jpg


:-)

Fuck off. Sweynforkbeard having the craic. Caught ya.


I hold my hands up. You're right - it was actually the Cheshire Regiment and some of the jokes involved the kind of mindless filth that young Bob would indulge in as banter with Northern Rail ticket office staff or over her shoulder to drunken chavs in a bus shelter outside a chip shop.
 
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
your not answering the question again, are you saying that a persons appearence/behaviour would not make you wary under any circumstances? yes or no

after you spoke to Zimmerman and he told you how he enjoyed his position did he say anything else that could be relevant to this or are you just presuming for the umpteenth time

And I asked if Zimmerman had been confronted with a white middle class college boy would he have done the same? You replied no, you didn't think so.
Did you ask him directly or was that just a guess too?
So we are both presuming here aren't we.
No need to get sarcy.
Anyway, it's my opinion that Zimmerman racially stereotyped that night.
Yes, it's a failing of human nature but I think it much more profound in the States than it is here.

you silly woman you asked me to guess i don't have a clue, you admitted you thought Zimmerman would have acted the same if the guy was a young white lad wearing a hoodie and a tattoo but you state Zimmerman racially stereotyped him, if he would have done the same with a white lad how can it be racial

and again

are you saying that a persons appearance/behaviour would not make you wary under any circumstances? yes or no

Oi gobby, quit the patronising remarks ok?! :-(

Yes, their appearance could make me wary. However, as the more informed poster earlier stated, Zimmerman seems to have placed an inordinate amount of phone calls to Police about black lads in particular.
 
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
And I asked if Zimmerman had been confronted with a white middle class college boy would he have done the same? You replied no, you didn't think so.
Did you ask him directly or was that just a guess too?
So we are both presuming here aren't we.
No need to get sarcy.
Anyway, it's my opinion that Zimmerman racially stereotyped that night.
Yes, it's a failing of human nature but I think it much more profound in the States than it is here.

you silly woman you asked me to guess i don't have a clue, you admitted you thought Zimmerman would have acted the same if the guy was a young white lad wearing a hoodie and a tattoo but you state Zimmerman racially stereotyped him, if he would have done the same with a white lad how can it be racial

and again

are you saying that a persons appearance/behaviour would not make you wary under any circumstances? yes or no

Oi gobby, quit the patronising remarks ok?! :-(

Yes, their appearance could make me wary. However, as the more informed poster earlier stated, Zimmerman seems to have placed an inordinate amount of phone calls to Police about black lads in particular.

Patronising really? your'e just grabbing any bit of info now i would give up if i was you
 
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
you silly woman you asked me to guess i don't have a clue, you admitted you thought Zimmerman would have acted the same if the guy was a young white lad wearing a hoodie and a tattoo but you state Zimmerman racially stereotyped him, if he would have done the same with a white lad how can it be racial

and again

are you saying that a persons appearance/behaviour would not make you wary under any circumstances? yes or no

Oi gobby, quit the patronising remarks ok?! :-(

Yes, their appearance could make me wary. However, as the more informed poster earlier stated, Zimmerman seems to have placed an inordinate amount of phone calls to Police about black lads in particular.

Patronising really? your'e just grabbing any bit of info now i would give up if i was you

Yes. Patronising. As in it felt like a 70 odd year old right wing male posting in reply.

Anyway, I thought it a good point about how often he reported blacks. Didn't you?
 
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
Oi gobby, quit the patronising remarks ok?! :-(

Yes, their appearance could make me wary. However, as the more informed poster earlier stated, Zimmerman seems to have placed an inordinate amount of phone calls to Police about black lads in particular.

Patronising really? your'e just grabbing any bit of info now i would give up if i was you

Yes. Patronising. As in it felt like a 70 odd year old right wing male posting in reply.

Anyway, I thought it a moot point about how often he reported blacks. Didn't you?

Unfortunately i can't guess how touchy or PC a fellow poster is, guessing and jumping to conclusions is your bag not mine

on the subject of reporting blacks i think more info is required really, you have made your mind up he is a rascist and he may well be, you just don't have any concrete facts to back it up

this thread alone proves the case isn't black and white(no pun) how any rational person can lean heavily to one side or the other is beyond me tbh
 
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
Patronising really? your'e just grabbing any bit of info now i would give up if i was you

Yes. Patronising. As in it felt like a 70 odd year old right wing male posting in reply.

Anyway, I thought it a moot point about how often he reported blacks. Didn't you?

Unfortunately i can't guess how touchy or PC a fellow poster is, guessing and jumping to conclusions is your bag not mine

on the subject of reporting blacks i think more info is required really, you have made your mind up he is a rascist and he may well be, you just don't have any concrete facts to back it up

this thread alone proves the case isn't black and white(no pun) how any rational person can lean heavily to one side or the other is beyond me tbh

Come on. You must have an opinion based on what we DO know. I understand why he was acquitted I honestly do, but everything about the guy smacks to me of someone who had a bee in his bonnet about blacks.
If me having that opinion is contrary to yours then fine. We are all individuals.

I agree that the gun laws in America need to be looked at; it's a bloody mad state of affairs out there.
 
nothing patronising about being called a silly woman...

The best part about this entire thing is there are like 4 idiots on here supporting zimmerman and most of their defence of him is telling people to give up and accusing them of not watching the trial. Anyone who thinks that dumb prick needed to kill someone to defend himself in a fight he started should seek help.
 
mackenzie said:
hilts said:
mackenzie said:
Yes. Patronising. As in it felt like a 70 odd year old right wing male posting in reply.

Anyway, I thought it a moot point about how often he reported blacks. Didn't you?

Unfortunately i can't guess how touchy or PC a fellow poster is, guessing and jumping to conclusions is your bag not mine

on the subject of reporting blacks i think more info is required really, you have made your mind up he is a rascist and he may well be, you just don't have any concrete facts to back it up

this thread alone proves the case isn't black and white(no pun) how any rational person can lean heavily to one side or the other is beyond me tbh

Come on. You must have an opinion based on what we DO know. I understand why he was acquitted I honestly do, but everything about the guy smacks to me of someone who had a bee in his bonnet about blacks.
If me having that opinion is contrary to yours then fine. We are all individuals.

I agree that the gun laws in America need to be looked at; it's a bloody mad state of affairs out there.

In all honesty i have no idea if he had a problem with blacks or was just pissed off with criminal elements in his area, he could see himself as some sort of clint eastwood wannabe, i haven't defended the guy

what is the strongest piece of info you have to suggest he is rascist?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top