Trickling Down!

This century has seen a dramatic shift in income inequality. So quite why this idiotic government thinks the rich need more help is beyond me. If making them richer helped we'd have seen it by now.
Abso-bloody-lutely this!!!
 
15 years in jail incoming mate...
It's 10 years, I made a mistake with that, but I forgot to add it won't be the judicial process as laid down in the Magna Carta that has protected our right to a free and fair trial for centuries, but the serving Home Secretary that will choose who they don't like, have them arrested, and choose how long they will serve in prison.

Those were Priti Patels ideas, and I return to the abuse of Statutary Instruments on those points. The Communications Bill was discussed in Parliament and the House of Lords, but after the white paper was returned to the House of Commons, she inserted those clauses without any further discussion or debate.

I've written on here before in other threads how we are currently sleepwalking into becoming a fascist state, where dissent of any sort won't be tolerated. The Communications Bill, and The Police and Crime Bill, will make undue criticism and protest illegal.

Bear in mind this is a Government that tried, and failed, to illegally prorogue Parliament. Our Prime Minister lied to the Queen, and when their intentions were correctly rejected by the highest court in the land, they called them lefty wokes and vowed to 'reform' them!

That reads like a Putin manifesto. Fucking scary stuff.
Fascism doesn't burst through the front door wearing jackboots and uniforms, it creeps in slowly through the unlit back door.
 
Look, I know its not popular, but I applaud the government for trying something different.

I bet there are builders and people who sell and fit hi-tech audio/video equipment who do very well in places like Knustford and Alderly Edge and Sale/Hale (where many of the City and United players reside). They then spend the money they have earnt in the local economy. Isn't that what 'trickle down' means?

I remember when I was a kid Labour had tax at like 98% for film stars and music stars, Sean Connery, Rod Stewart etc. so they all just went and lived in Switzerland or Monaco.

Surely this is a better system?

You applaud making the top earners 10% better off by borrowing extra money at high rates of interest that we’ll all have to pay back?
Have you really thought it through?


Is this one of those Rhetorical questionmibobs
 
This century has seen a dramatic shift in income inequality. So quite why this idiotic government thinks the rich need more help is beyond me. If making them richer helped we'd have seen it by now.

I don’t think they think the rich need any more help or that they think this policy helps. Its just greed sold to the gullible as an economic policy which will ultimately benefit the less well off also. There will be Tory voters, facing real struggles who will lap this up based on reading the Sun and the Daily Mail.
 
It's all so contradictory. The government handle over millions to the rich I. The hopes they spend it to boost the economy, meanwhile the Bank of England are increasing interest rates to try and stop spending to easy inflation.
The cunts really don't have a clue.
 
Following the recent Billionaire's Budget thought it would be a good idea to set up a thread where we can all record examples of where very rich people having even more money has benefitted us normal folks.

At the moment the Trickle Down Effect just sounds like they are pissing on us, but I very much look forward to hearing all the lovely heart-warming stories of bankers passing on their bonuses to us plebs or business owners paying the heating bills for all their workers etc.

Go...
We don’t have (and haven’t for a very long time) a “trickle-down” Conservative outlook govt.

They have mainly been Neo-Liberal, which concentrates capital among very few people and allows them to get ridiculously rich and their money being spent around a small bunch of elite-concentrated businesses that cater only for the rich, or often spending their money abroad (if they even spend their money at all because a lot of the time the richest get things for free!), and it doesn’t trickle down through the rest of the economy or classes.

I can’t think of the last time we had Disraeli’s idea of Conservatism. David Cameron said he was a One-Nation Conservative but he lead an Austerity coalition with the LidDems so wasn’t ONC.

In One-Nationism the working class receive support from govt and from the richest people in society (and I’m not taking about a dozen of the richest people giving to charities around the world, because that doesn’t benefit the working class in this country) and that the classes have a responsibility for each other.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look, I know its not popular, but I applaud the government for trying something different.

I bet there are builders and people who sell and fit hi-tech audio/video equipment who do very well in places like Knustford and Alderly Edge and Sale/Hale (where many of the City and United players reside). They then spend the money they have earnt in the local economy. Isn't that what 'trickle down' means?

I remember when I was a kid Labour had tax at like 98% for film stars and music stars, Sean Connery, Rod Stewart etc. so they all just went and lived in Switzerland or Monaco.

Surely this is a better system?
The chronic lack of investment outside London in the last 30 years proves that there is no such thing as trickling down. Property and currency speculators have made a fortune in recent decades and have invested their profits in London or abroad. The UK has one of the most unbalanced economies in the world and it is hammering most of us outside the South East.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.