Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,383
Haha but they didn't find any moneyhats for our part, with Liverpool they did.They will when there's money on the table!
Haha but they didn't find any moneyhats for our part, with Liverpool they did.They will when there's money on the table!
Unless you've got proof of that you can fuck right off.They will when there's money on the table!
But it doesn't work like that... a smaller club does not improve your chance at making it, you'll get first team football sooner but a much poorer football education which will stand you in better stead in the long run? I know which I'd choose anyway. You've not really explained why Oldham would be better than Manchester City... it's really not you only think it is, you have to be careful equating first team football at a much lower level sooner with a poorer footballing education is better than the best education you can get with a team of professionals that will find you a club for first team football should you not make the first team.But it doesn't work like that. Of course we have amazing facilities, but being at City doesn't mean it improves your chance of making it in football. It can actually work against you.
Being at a smaller club, like Bury, or Oldham Athletic can improve your chances of making it - which are still slim, but it can certainly have less attrition at that level.
This is the big problem with big name clubs - young kids are drawn to big names, and often their parents are too, and that's where the false hope comes from... the faintest hope of playing for City / United / Liverpool etc is VERY persuasive, but the child can still be better served at Oldham, or Southampton etc. We have to be so careful about equating the best facilities with the best chance at making it. It's not the same thing and it's one of the reasons the rules are in place to stop big clubs dazzling kids and their parents.
Given @Frank76 's posting history especially on the academy thread I wouldn't take him seriously.Well you are of course correct. Fans do not understand the recruitment of kids.
However it is just as naive to believe City are worse than some other clubs in this.
As I said before as the size of the club increases it gets more and more difficult to control. We do have unscrupulous employees, that i am sure, as do other clubs.
Haha but they didn't find any moneyhats for our part, with Liverpool they did.
Given @Frank76 's posting history especially on the academy thread I wouldn't take him seriously.
So if you sign sign say a 16 year old Spanish National play in say in SwitUnless you've got proof of that you can fuck right off.
Given @Frank76 's posting history especially on the academy thread I wouldn't take him seriously.
Sounds like a brilliant suggestion for a club that's just had it's knuckles rapped for bending the rules!
Do you currently work in Academy recruitment?