The point is mate txiki has been discussed for a while but at certain points in a season it will be discussed again and the natural time is after a season changing defeat. I don't accept the argument that because we had been on a good run and this thread wasn't added to means anything. What response would a poster get and what point would it serve to even mention him?
Is our defence pretty poor? Yes
Has this been a problem for a number of transfer windows? Yes
Has the club spent a huge amount of money? Yes
Is this a good place to be in? No
Has it cost us this season and previous ones? Yes
Is it natural to discuss the one person that is the constant? Yes
If people find this strange that is entirely at their discretion and they can tell us why, but please tell me why when for instance I showed the net spend for us and other clubs and compared our defence with Spurs who have spent 500 million less was there deafening silence? Why for instance when a poster says those questioning txiki must have physcological problems or some bizarre envy is this not seen as somwhat out of order?
But what do we get instead? Aren't you all pathetic bringing this up after a defeat. These guys know more than you so shut up. With this in mind is the current stance we shan't discuss the club and its employees until certain posters tell us we can? If this is the case then someone should let us know.
It's almost like some staff are beyond criticism.... and not for the first time.