mexico1970
Well-Known Member
I find crossover boxing quite pathetic. Stupidly, I will watch, so I am part of the problem.
If you can watch it without paying for it then you could alleviate some of that guilt for watching it mate :)
I find crossover boxing quite pathetic. Stupidly, I will watch, so I am part of the problem.
ooooeeerrrr matron!What time are they expected to enter the ring?
Stone him............. ;-)I find crossover boxing quite pathetic. Stupidly, I will watch, so I am part of the problem.
It'd be like Man City drawing Harpenden Town in the FA Cup. It's not really a sporting competition if your opponent has literally zero chance.
To be fair BH, it's probably more akin to City playing the men's GB Olympic hockey team - both very good at what they do but the skills are different.
I assume the other guy is very good at what he does in his field.
I don't get the spectacle to be honest..........
Would you spend £30 or whatever it is to watch City play Bournemouth on PPV?Fury is about 1/14
That would be about the same odds at City at home to a lower half prem side/championship side
David v Goliath..... nuff said.That's fair - but I think people's problem is that there are underdogs and then there's this.
Somebody on Sky described it as the equivalent of letting the World Table Tennis champion have a go at Novak Djokovic.
It'd be like Man City drawing Harpenden Town in the FA Cup. It's not really a sporting competition if your opponent has literally zero chance.
Would you spend £30 or whatever it is to watch City play Bournemouth on PPV?
Which is akin to this tonight, isn’t it?No, I wouldn’t.
The demand wouldn’t be there so they would never charge that.