r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
the under 18`s seem to have a lot of 16 year olds in the team
the under 18`s seem to have a lot of 16 year olds in the team
Already missing to day were Sancho,Francis and Diaz ( although he is hardly an 18's anymore) also no Luke Bolton and then Latibeaudierre got a bit of an injury so we saw Nathaniel Ogbeta at center back ( looked good too) plus Taylor Richards and Henri Ogunby who both look more than ok at this level. Add to that Jeremie Frimpong and you certainly have some young young players.
Not the best performance today even though we were miles the better side and had a few top individual performances.The first half was really enjoyable but only 2 nil and in the 2nd half we just missed too many chances
Speaking of which, what's with Ambrose? Has he had a knockback?
the under 18`s seem to have a lot of 16 year olds in the team
Last years u18's were prematurely promoted to the u23's to make room for this current potentially golden generation of u18's, last years undefeated u16s.
That's why they are nearly all 16 & 17.
Some of them (Sancho, Francis) are 16 and playing in the u23's already against kids 6 & 7 years older.
thanks mate would love to go when it doesnt interfer with the first team home and aways
Last years u18's were prematurely promoted to the u23's to make room for this current potentially golden generation of u18's, last years undefeated u16s.
That's why they are nearly all 16 & 17.
Some of them (Sancho, Francis) are 16 and playing in the u23's already against kids 6 & 7 years older.
Like this game against Sunderland!
exactly but other real life problems got in the way, i do think the advertising of the games could be better
exactly but other real life problems got in the way, i do think the advertising of the games could be better