This is all bullshit.
Firstly, he has to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that Etihad is a "friendly company" to Man City and "both having owners from Abu Dhabi" won't cut it. Good luck with that.
After this, he would have to prove that the friendly company purposely offered above market value. The stadium is worth £10m whilst the New York Mets (with a much lower brand awareness) is worth more than that, so, good luck with that.
Then, he has to show that the shirt sponsorship deal doesn't represent fair market value. Our sponsorship deal is worth less than many clubs worldwide. So, good luck with that.
Then, he has to prove that the Etihad Campus' naming rights aren't worth £10m without any comparable project to point at for market value. Good luck with that.
Essentially, Cook has outmanoeuvred them all and they can't touch us. Platini's just been owned.
Firstly, he has to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that Etihad is a "friendly company" to Man City and "both having owners from Abu Dhabi" won't cut it. Good luck with that.
After this, he would have to prove that the friendly company purposely offered above market value. The stadium is worth £10m whilst the New York Mets (with a much lower brand awareness) is worth more than that, so, good luck with that.
Then, he has to show that the shirt sponsorship deal doesn't represent fair market value. Our sponsorship deal is worth less than many clubs worldwide. So, good luck with that.
Then, he has to prove that the Etihad Campus' naming rights aren't worth £10m without any comparable project to point at for market value. Good luck with that.
Essentially, Cook has outmanoeuvred them all and they can't touch us. Platini's just been owned.