Adressed it here already.
I have not seen your reaction to that earlier post explaining all the points.
Keep in mind that you are here putting all your faith on that article from Tariq Panja while other reputable sources have reported other things.
Panja says that Leterme even decided to chose an higher value for the sponsorships than the club value. How do you explain that the QTA contract went from 100 to 58 then ? Why did all Qatari contracts got devalued by 37% if Leterme didn't contest PSG valuation ?
Wouldn't a fair reporting be that Leterme devalued those contracts by 37% but the portuguese judge wanted a more severe devaluation ?
Regarding the famous rule he said that has been flouted (a third auditing team should have been chosen), look at that :
Isn't it that UEFA actually followed their own rules in PSG case ?
Why after being asked to provide the document with the numbers he pretends to have, Tariq Panja cannot elaborate ?
The other sources are all talking about how
-PSG contracts have been devaluated (was proven right)
-UEFA FFP forcing PSG to terminating QTA in its form (was proven right)
-PSG having to balance the books after the contracts were devaluated by selling players and getting new sponsors (was proven right)