That has to be one of the most disingenuous comments I've ever read from Harris - and there are some serious contenders in his output, so I don't say that lightly!
He makes out as if he is 'just reporting on an issue', suggesting an impartial presentation of the facts - which anyone with even a passing knowledge of his form would tell you is complete fantasy.
It takes two to tango, and perhaps if he didn't constantly take the most antagonistic and dismissive angle in his reporting of City's perspective on this story, he might get a more measured response in return. If you instantly take an openly sneering and disrespectful tone to any perspective the club or it's fanbase puts out, without ever attempting to consider whether any of it has merit (and I'm not for a moment suggesting it all does, by the way), you will get the same tone coming right back at you. I don't think most City fans expect any of our esteemed reporters in the media to simply gobble up the club position and regurgitate it unquestioningly as the truth. If you read this thread alone, you'll see plenty of criticism from our own fans on how the club is managing certain aspects of this process. All we expect is a bit of balance in the reporting our media presents to us - which I'm sure even they, if they're really honest with themselves, would concede there is precious little of at the moment.
Harris is hardly the innocent bystander simply reporting the facts in relation to City that he's so disingenuously attempting to paint himself as. He references 'multiple angles', yet as far as I can see there is only one angle he seems remotely interested in taking throughout this story. If you throw enough mud at a club and a fanbase, don't be surprised and play the sanctimonious card when they start to throw it back at you.