The Colonel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,027
Just a blanket statement is likely.Duvet not have to deliver their opinion on our guilt/innocence at that stage?
Just a blanket statement is likely.Duvet not have to deliver their opinion on our guilt/innocence at that stage?
I think this is not what the resident legal experts said. I understood CAS would judge the case completely anew. @projectriver ?
Are you of the opinion that UEFA have additional information other than the leaks given their lawyers have obviously advised them to pursue this in court?CAS will go through the whole matter de novo (afresh) based on both sides' submissions and the evidence presented. They will consider the application of the rules including limitations, the relevant rules and, if it finds UEFA were entitled to review matters from 2012-2016 (City say UEFA were not for a number of reasons), it will consider the substantive matters ie whether City did, in fact, breach the rules. I agree we will probably not get a full view of the judgment until some weeks after the summary of the decision.
Suspect its the leaks plus the information already in their possession from before 2016/17. And obviously anything else shared in the appeal process.Are you of the opinion that UEFA have additional information other than the leaks given their lawyers have obviously advised them to pursue this in court?
And amazingly he didn’t play for the scum or the dippersI just don’t see how you can say that Tolm. I don’t think City or UEFA have any inkling whatsoever. We may be confident in our evidence but let’s be honest, OJ Simpson was bang to rights and a court let him walk free.
They banned us for 2 years plus the fine, there was no way once we took it to CAS that UEFA would back down and say 'You know what? Forget about it.' They're not pursuing anything, they're frantically defending their actions.Are you of the opinion that UEFA have additional information other than the leaks given their lawyers have obviously advised them to pursue this in court?
I don’t think that’s correct is it? They aren’t just looking at the process, they are looking at the facts, and giving their view on whether we actually breached the rules. If we are not guilty of anything, but uefa have followed the correct process, then we are still not guiltyCAS are not there to determine our supposed quilt they will judge on the process
A short explanation of the verdict will be published with a comprehensive one at a later date
It'll be bunkem.Just a blanket statement is likely.
Cant you just give it a rest.It'll be bunkem
I'll sleep on that one.Cant you just give it a rest.