UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[HalfwayUpTheKippax]

Duvet not have to deliver their opinion on our guilt/innocence at that stage?

These puns are getting me down.

 

[hilts]

These puns are getting me eiderdown.

 

[jimharri]

Okay folks, let's stick to the subject of the thread and avoid bringing up old, controversial cases from America. They have nothing to do with our case.

 

[Proy]

I just don’t see how you can say that Tolm. I don’t think City or UEFA have any inkling whatsoever. We may be confident in our evidence but let’s be honest, OJ Simpson was bang to rights and a court let him walk free.

That is something of a naive point of view

 

[@BluePhil8]

That is something of a naive point of view

I think you’re naive if you’re expecting complete exoneration from CAS. I hope I’m wrong.

 

[KS55]

Let’s hope Soriano doesn’t have the same outcome as El Chapo...

As a result of CAS's ruling, Soriano was last seen digging his way out of the Etihad.

 

[KS55]

It'll be bunkem.

And will cover our entire rap sheet.

 

[M18CTID]

Suspect its the leaks plus the information already in their possession from before 2016/17. And obviously anything else shared in the appeal process.

I can’t see how info already in their possession from years ago can add weight to their case. That is what led to the settlement agreement in 2014 and they can’t just decide to use that to further punish us can they? Surely it has to be fresh info they weren’t aware of at the time, ie: the e-mails in the DS articles, plus there could be something else that we’re not aware of.

 

[Blue Mist]

Okay folks, let's stick to the subject of the thread and avoid bringing up old, controversial cases from America. They have nothing to do with our case.

I've read that 3 times and I am still trying to work out the quilt pun that is hidden in there.

 

[slbsn]

I can’t see how info already in their possession from years ago can add weight to their case. That is what led to the settlement agreement in 2014 and they can’t just decide to use that to further punish us can they? Surely it has to be fresh info they weren’t aware of at the time, ie: the e-mails in the DS articles, plus there could be something else that we’re not aware of.

We are speculating but its perfectly plausible that old information when added to DS information takes on a different complexion. If nothing else, if they tell a different story to each other that is likely to form some basis of UEFA's argument. But guessing