UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Bozzie]

12 premier league clubs want to know what our punishment will be. Sounds like Willie McKay is running the show. When I said 12 clubs I meant three or four but wanted to make it look like more were on board. What a load of bollocks this whole affair is, why don't those who have instigated all this shit stick their heads above the parapet and admit the truth. This is going to get very messy

Sounds like every Premier League club has been contacted by a journalist and asked a hypothetical question regarding whether a club (possibly named, possibly not) should face investigation if accused by a third party of breaching FFPR. Seven have refused to be drawn whilst twelve have bitten.

 

[chaddblue]

They’re just shit stirring mate

Who are? The clubs or the newspaper that is saying it?

 

[St.Pauli support]

This isn't whistleblowing.

Is your interpretation.
A court will have a say if he is a whistleblower or a hacker, driven by greed.

Both ways suggest publishing original data surely?

 

[OmgOgs]

Who are? The clubs or the newspaper that is saying it?

The 12 clubs I should think.

 

[decmancity]

UEFA want this to end up in the CAS. In the CAS illegally obtained documents can be used as evidence.

I didn't know that, well lets see where it gets to.

Quite looking forward to the ride tbh, let Khaldoon really flex his muscles.

 

[aguero93:20]

Is your interpretation.
A court will have a say if he is a whistleblower or a hacker, driven by greed.

Both ways suggest publishing original data surely?

No, it's not whistleblowing, as you can't avail of the protections available to whistleblowers if you've committed a crime in obtaining your information, you're not a whistleblower if you don't hand the information directly to the relevant authorities and you're not a whistleblower if the actions you expose aren't criminal.
Hacking is a crime.
Extortion is a crime.
Selling stolen goods/data is a crime.
Handling stolen goods/data is a crime.

Der Spiegel are not a relevant authority.
FootballLeaks are not a relevant authority.

FFPR are not laws, directives or legislation enforced by a judiciary system.
UEFA are not a financial regulator.

 

[BlueMoonraker]

Sounds like every Premier League club has been contacted by a journalist and asked a hypothetical question regarding whether a club (possibly named, possibly not) should face investigation if accused by a third party of breaching FFPR. Seven have refused to be drawn whilst twelve have bitten.

I wonder what our answer was :)

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

I wonder what our answer was :)

The others couldn't be contacted or refused to comment. They rang each and every club with a loaded question.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Rag, according to some on here anyway.

But you are bang on. Reputation is everything. We're a club trying to build a bigger fanbase with bigger sponsorship deals. To have our name dragged through the mud is enough for some

I'll vouch for you. Deffo not a rag.

 

[Allnightlong]

The others couldn't be contacted or refused to comment. They rang each and every club with a loaded question.

is that true TH?.......if so then then ultimate shit stirring by the media