UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
blueinsa said:
I know this guy has worked for City in the last and was tasked with gathering info that led to certain refs disappearing from the game after fucking us over. He now says he wont work with us any longer because of security leaks that he insists come from and still do come from within.
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t worry about him mate, he’s a crank
 
Prater70 said:
Question for Parsian. Nothing personal but do you think your chairman will stand down ?
Click to expand...
If he gets convicted, and i think he should and will, i expect him to be told to stand down by the ones above him. Nasser Al Khelaifi (NAK) is nothing but their trusted "right hand" man and everything he has done professionally was probably ordered by them.

It is certainly not a coincidence Leonardo has been called back after NAK trouble with the justice. The former is the face of PSG in the media while the latter almost never leaves the shadow recently. This is a clear sign he won't be allowed to stay in the light if his image is tarnished by a court sentence.

I'm not too concerned about NAK fate because Qatar will probably appoint another high profile Qatari to oversee their business. Nasser or another won't change that much even if Nasser truly loves the club.
Image of Nasser with PSG shirt in 1998:


What matters is the men they recruit to lead the club. Jean-Claude Blanc is the one overseeing the administrative part (FFP too) and is maybe the most valuable person in the board. Leonardo built the first team after QSI takeover and many of his recruits proved to be better than the ones that followed. Thus, i have a bit of optimism he will be able to balance our squad in the future. No one really cares about NAK among our fanbase.
 
The perfect fumble said:
hancock.jpg
Click to expand...
Had no idea Claudio Reyna had a career in acting.

You really do learn something new every day.
 
blueinsa said:
No I dont know him mate but have heard from people i would say are reliable that he was paid by City to dig up info on referees as we felt we where being done over and he produced enough evidence that saw a few suddenly retire from the game.

The blog aside i think he makes a living out of working with clubs to provide similar info.
Click to expand...

what ref was that.
 
blueinsa said:
I know this guy has worked for City in the last and was tasked with gathering info that led to certain refs disappearing from the game after fucking us over. He now says he wont work with us any longer because of security leaks that he insists come from and still do come from within.
Click to expand...
Yes I have read that as well about our security leaks from him, he also has written that Vicky Kloss is very poor secuirty wise on the IT front.
 
As I read David Conns musings re liverpool and the fabulous way they have worked with FFP something has worried me You see many years ago David and i were on a trip to Israel. It was 1979 and whilst on these trips we did many hikes On one particular venture we were high up. in the mountains discussing our favourite topic CITY he was as big blue like myself. and i hqd just heard from home that we were selling Peter Barnes for £750,000 Both engrossed i stupidly missed my step and fell ending up stuck arse upwards.in a tree I never forget the first person to scramble down to see if i was ok was David and here is the rub Since the takeover in 2008 he has used his column to SHIT STIR The club he claims to adore so much that i feel sad that i now feel i should have pushed him down the f-----g mountain Hindsight hey
 
manchester blue said:
I disagree we will fight on a technicality. City have said that we have irrefutable evidence that we are innocent.

We want to prove our innocence and not just get off. We could have done a deal, it seems, but we would be forever tainted if we did. We want to clear our name.
Click to expand...
Not only that. Maybe we wanted someone, ahem! let’s say competent enough to argue the case for us, to get that irrefutable evidence and whatever else we have heard.

That may prove as difficult as, or more so, than fighting their processes on a technicality.
 
laserblue said:
City could 'suggest' that UEFA re-examine Liverpool's failure of FFP in 2015 and their fraudulent offsetting of non-existent stadium development against FFP losses. The question also remains as to why UEFA condoned this by accepting this blatant fraud as completely above board.
Click to expand...

The think we are reportedly using against Liverpool / UEFA is Liverpools hacking of us not the FFP stuff so not related

One thing I have just thought thats obvious yet I missed it is you cannot split performance improvements in different competitions. People want us sanction in the league for allegedly breaking UEFA FFP. Even tho league FFP are very light.

Liverpool alleged hacking if resulting in them getting better players could have helped them in multiple competitions or helped them meet UEFA FFP by selling players that they found for little money

People should read the comments on the mail about city allegedly using the Liverpools alleged hacking in the UEFA stuff. Wow the bitterness you wouldnt think that one side was accused of breaking FFP rules and the other the actual law. A lot of people saying it was our own fault we got hacked. People seem to think if you use someones passwords its not really hacking or against the law.

I get that rival fans even non Liverpool ones might dislike us more than them and believe us less but both if proven should condemned even tho FFP is wrong in many respects

What rules do UEFA have about hacking of rival clubs or treating opponents with respect or whatever it was called by the Premier League.

I take it UEFA have not been in contact with city since the news of the hacking reappeared
 
WRicko said:
The think we are reportedly using against Liverpool / UEFA is Liverpools hacking of us not the FFP stuff so not related

One thing I have just thought thats obvious yet I missed it is you cannot split performance improvements in different competitions. People want us sanction in the league for allegedly breaking UEFA FFP. Even tho league FFP are very light.

Liverpool alleged hacking if resulting in them getting better players could have helped them in multiple competitions or helped them meet UEFA FFP by selling players that they found for little money

People should read the comments on the mail about city allegedly using the Liverpools alleged hacking in the UEFA stuff. Wow the bitterness you wouldnt think that one side was accused of breaking FFP rules and the other the actual law. A lot of people saying it was our own fault we got hacked. People seem to think if you use someones passwords its not really hacking or against the law.

I get that rival fans even non Liverpool ones might dislike us more than them and believe us less but both if proven should condemned even tho FFP is wrong in many respects

What rules do UEFA have about hacking of rival clubs or treating opponents with respect or whatever it was called by the Premier League.

I take it UEFA have not been in contact with city since the news of the hacking reappeared
Click to expand...

Serious question, is 'Whataboutism' a legal tactic?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top