OB1
Well-Known Member
I don't think Conn has done anything more than lift Colin's find and then present it as his own work, with zero commitment to acting upon the discrepancies of the Open Skies document and this hacked email.
We have never denied the emails, only that they were taken out of context.
I think what is more worrying is that ADUG are mentioned by name, no ambiguity, unless it has been doctored.
Which email concerns HH?
Which still leaves us posing the question what City have or have not yet presented which is irrefutable?
It can only be the paper trail showing the money going from ADEC to Etihad?
Can ADEC give it to ADUG directly?
The whole thing about context is really important.
The email in question may merely have been referring to where the funds would be paid to City from; it does not necessarily indicate who the ultimate source of the funds was.
ADUG could have received money to pass on to City from ADEC, Mansour or (less likely, I know) Etihad. There's plenty of reasons why a parent company might want to hold onto cash and only let a subsidiary have it when they actually need it.
Nothing in that email proves that the cash paid on behalf of Etihad to City was not ultimately provided by a source related to Etihad but not related to City.