Nicholas van Whatsisface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 2,960
What do you mean by ‘concrete’?
Hah!
Poor choice of word in this context, granted!
What do you mean by ‘concrete’?
One thing that rarely gets repeated on this thread is that both parties stated that they were happy with the proceedings of the CAS meeting.
Maybe I'm an optimist, but City were confident prior and remain so to this day, so I'm of the opinion that it went well.
For UEFA? This may intimate that they are happy with what City have now presented and are content with their "evidence".
I know neither can effect the decision, but I've always been in a positive mood about this.
One thing that bothers me about the "irrefutable evidence", is the word believe, why not say we have irrefutable evidence?
Ferran Soriano, “We delivered a long list of documents and support that we believe is irrefutable evidence that the claims are not true and it was hard because we did this in the context of information being leaked to the media in the context of feeling that every step of the way, every engagement we had, we felt that we were considered guilty before anything was even discussed.
https://www.the42.ie/manchester-city-uefa-ban-soriano-5013704-Feb2020/
Tbh mate I doubt either party was going to come out and say they were unhappy with how it went? I like your optimism thoughOne thing that rarely gets repeated on this thread is that both parties stated that they were happy with the proceedings of the CAS meeting.
Maybe I'm an optimist, but City were confident prior and remain so to this day, so I'm of the opinion that it went well.
For UEFA? This may intimate that they are happy with what City have now presented and are content with their "evidence".
I know neither can effect the decision, but I've always been in a positive mood about this.
Neither party will be given the decision before very early Monday morning. That’s what I’ve been told anyway. I would tend to believe it as there’s been zero leaks which would’ve come had it been communicated already.
He's Italian, they always sit on the fence holding the flag (white) until they can see who is winning , then they jump on that side.
They won’t do that via a fixed draw, that’s just too provable, they will do it via dodgy refereeing or varNo it hasn't been fixed so far
But if the ban is upheld fully or partially... doubt UEFA will want us anywhere near their showpiece final
Is that £250m the £200m we might lose by not being in the CL for 2 seasons plus the £50m we're suing UEFA for?There is £250,000,000 at stake on this decision. As well as preparing their media response, City have obligations to shareholders with regards to the result.
No way are they only finding out a couple of hours before the announcement, on a decision taken weeks ago.
If and when we are cleared, "we have lift off" I think are owner will remain quite, unlike his cheque book , I think we will see statement signings!Look at it the other satisfying way if we are exonerated, the media and lots of journalists will be in their own difficult position. Now thats a nice thought for the weekend.
I would be surprised if that was the case.
I would think UEFA and City would both want time to prepare a statement to be released immediately after the verdict is made public.
For both parties the decision is going to seriously effect their futures one way or the other.
Why are uefa bothered about the verdict taking away from the draw ?
There are no people there no press there so who would be asking questions regarding the ban or no ban ?
Preparing a statement takes an hour. My understanding is that all parties will be informed early Monday am.
Public announcement might not be until the afternoon.
Of course i may be wrong. Either way not long now !
Depends of course on the CAS view of both sides but up to now I trust our owners much more than I trust UEFA.I actually agree that the most likely outcome is the ban being upheld, and voted that way in the poll on this thread. I just can’t see us being cleared, however hard I try to understand the reasons for optimism.
That said, I think you’re simplifying too much to say the optimism you’re seeing on here is solely based on the positivity of other posters. The Club has been unequivocal and strident in stating our position that we have done nothing whatsoever to warrant this sanction, and have irrefutable proof to support that position.
People have taken a lot of optimism from the Club’s statements, and trust them to carry through on their words with action in this case - which I completely understand.
The optimism on here isn’t just echo chamber self-delusion - there is plenty to support it outside of this thread.
If we are cleared you think anyone will be worried about the draw? The camera would pan over to Tikixi , Ferran and maybe even Khaldoon, all 3 with big daft grins of there face, trying to catch the attention of Ms Gill and co. SKY could put that on box office, I would pay big bucks for itWhy are uefa bothered about the verdict taking away from the draw ?
There are no people there no press there so who would be asking questions regarding the ban or no ban ?