UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
No wonder our exec were so confident. Is HHSM and that horse one and the same person? Never been seen together.

Bit like these two....

Klopp..................................................................Yorkshire Terrier..............................

dog_thumb__3.jpg
 
Cheeseman quote is quite significant imho. He might not be held is the highest regard by most but he does have direct ties to the club.

I don’t think he wouldn’t have posted this if his “source” wasn’t reliable and also have a feeling due to his ties to the club, the have maybe given him the Ok?

Just a thought
 
Ian Cheeseman now gets recognised on news now (it it a blog aggregator) as the first “pundit” saying Manchester City are going to be cleared. Not done his external profile any harm has it?
It will have if he's wrong.
I have a theory about why he is sticking his neck out...

But I will keep it to myself until after the decision is announced. ;-)
 
Interesting news that I've been told is that another of our witnesses at CAS was HH Sheikh Mohammed himself, who testified that the money for the Etihad & other sponsorships came from him, via the Crown Prince Court, and not ADUG.

If that's true then case closed and we've won.

I’ve just heard exactly the same thing so it’s obvious we’re hearing it off the same person ;)
 
I told you before, he isn’t putting his nuts on the block, he is taking a calculated gamble of trying to look ITK. It’s a punt. If it’s right he looks great, I’d he’s wrong it gets forgotten. Classic wannabe ITK. In my opinion

Exactly this.

He makes his living off an audience and that tweet has 2k retweets and 2k likes already. Job done in that sense, I'd confidently predict he know fuck all like everyone else.
 
Interesting news that I've been told is that another of our witnesses at CAS was HH Sheikh Mohammed himself, who testified that the money for the Etihad & other sponsorships came from him, via the Crown Prince Court, and not ADUG.

If that's true then case closed and we've won.
Hey buddy, sorry for my ignorance, but can you break down for us why claiming the money came from him, not ADUG, is significant?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top