UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[SilvaisSkyBlue]

If you look at the time the first tweet was made, it was yesterday, meaning he was saying the club found out this morning. His latest tweet about the verdict, was about an hour ago. Hope it's bullshit.

He is just another Twitter fùckwit who has 6 followers, you can find thousands of such fùckwits on that platform, nothing to worry about.

 

[Cobwebcat]

I hope they took more care over our defence at CAS ;)

Bum bum!

 

[HarrytheBlue]

I find it very strange that even if we do know the outcome, that anyone other than the main men would know about it. It’s madness to even allow a leak and what does it gain?

I don't want to hear anything until the announcement.

 

[Metalartin]

He is just another Twitter fùckwit who has 6 followers, you can find thousands of such fùckwits on that platform, nothing to worry about.

Yeah, I wasn't saying I believed it but it's hard to ignore the little seeds of doubt that people will no doubt try and cast, to wind the City fans up over the next 48 hours.

 

[DrBlueBob]

Just chuck a bucket of piss at him.

Old school.

 

[bobmcfc]

Stuart Pearce, co-commentating at the end of the Sheffield Utd v Chelsea game just finished, says he would be astounded if CAS overturned the City ban. There you have it ... from the horses mouth that is Beany!

He always was a clueless ****

 

[Cobwebcat]

I think Pep is enjoying himself at this point he also can’t wait to give his side of the story first chance he gets on Monday.

UEFA must cringe every time he brings it up.

 

[DrBlueBob]

Beanie brought James on apparently, not Pearce

It's not Beanie's fault that calamity had dillusions that he was a no 10 playmaker. A pony can put you up front but he can't make you score.

 

[Tarzan41]

Anyone looked into this guy?

He says that a mate who is high up at City told him then says City don’t know. He has 6 followers. Nothing to see there

 

[HarrytheBlue]

No, this is wrong. They will have considered all the evdence submitted on the substantive issue. Process will be a minor point, if any.

In any court case, both sides submit their evidence in bundles, and we certainly would have been given UEFA's evidence, but I'm not sure whether we would have had the opportunity to cross examine them. Natural justice says we should, but how can we have done so when the hearing lasted only a few days ?