UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Winchester]

Nope, the server will be ramped up though in preparation.

Sounds ominous!

 

[Big Dave Watson]

Question for Ric. On the poll at the top why is the ‘Two year ban upheld’ option in bold?

 

[avoidconfusion]

I'd say, whichever side "loses" tomorrow will appeal. This could drag on for a while yet.

I can see UEFA just leaving it if they lose.

 

[kaz7]

"Spell check", eh? Riiight.

Never buy an Amazon fire tablet if you want spellchecker to work,it changes I to u unless you use the capital I,changes words from posting to reading the post,drives me mad but the rest of it works very well so what can you do

 

[citytill1die84]

Question for Ric. On the poll at the top why is the ‘Two year ban upheld’ option in bold?

Because that's what u voted?

 

[SWP's back]

Why would Ian Cheeseman know information that if leaked may bring about contempt of court?

So he’s first and privy to what would be one of the most closely guarded secrets, but he can hardly even get low-profile player transfer information?

Whilst I agree with your sentiment. There would absolutely be no contempt of court for several reasons.

 

[Phil1]

Question for Ric. On the poll at the top why is the ‘Two year ban upheld’ option in bold?

Is that the option you voted for?

In fact, silly question, of course it is! Haha!

 

[Jazzman]

For me it would at this point be helpful with a summary of what UEFA actually and precisely is accusing us of. I am sure one or more of our legal maesters on this thread have already written this up, and would be grateful if anyone could point me to a crucial post.

If my memory serves me right we are accused that a large part of the Etihad sponsor deal was paid by our owner Sheik Mansour, rather than Etihad themselves. I also think the accusation only covers the period 2012-2014, i.e. a period for which we were already punished once, and for which we have an agreement with UEFA that the case was closed.

Most of the things I read on the internet regarding the CAS case are not even able to precisely explain what we are accused of, and it dawned on me that I am also not 100% sure how to explain it myself :-(

 

[Sky Blue]

Question for Ric. On the poll at the top why is the ‘Two year ban upheld’ option in bold?

Haha busted.

 

[Big Dave Watson]

Is that the option you voted for?

In fact, silly question, of course it is! Haha!

Of course I did.