UK far right trouble

[babyape]

some of these people who "just got caught up in stuff " really have a chequered past. His brief tried the "he is on the autistic spectrum " as a defence - its odd when a person of colour goes down a mental health strategy the Right are all over it as bull shit

Teenager? Christ! Tough paper round in Hull!!!

 

[bluethrunthru]

Teenager? Christ! Tough paper round in Hull!!!

but on the upside Hull is the home of chip spice ...............

 

[cleavers]

A lot of these cunts seem to have been inside before, what a fucking surprise

Great speach that from the judge, those 2 have probably never contributed anything as tax payers, yet complain about people who come here and do.

 

[halfcenturyup]

You missed out the word possible , there are no proven consequences are there?

I don't know. What sort of proof would you be looking for?

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

I don't know. What sort of proof would you be looking for?

A proven link between an online post and a crime, isnt that usually the way crimes are solved. At present it's just an assumption that a post could cause actually trouble is it not.

 

[I'm With Stupid]

Teenager? Christ! Tough paper round in Hull!!!

BBC says he's 25. But there have been so many of them where I've thought there's no way they're that age.

Guy on the right, apparently 48. Looks about 60.

A 40 year-old on the right there.

Another 40 year-old on the left.

41 years-old.

53 years-old

My school year are all 40 now, and half of these people look like they could be their dads/mums.

Also nice to see Humpty Dumpty getting a conviction.

 

[I'm With Stupid]

A proven link between an online post and a crime, isnt that usually the way crimes are solved. At present it's just an assumption that a post could cause actually trouble is it not.

That's how the law around inciting racial hatred and incitement to violence works, yes. Otherwise the only way saying that someone should be murdered could ever be a crime is if you're literally hiring a hitman. And that's because we recognise that there doesn't have to be a one-to-one causal relationship between a single utterance and someone acting on it for hateful/provocative speech to result in violence.

 

[5 Hit Gibbon]

BBC says he's 25. But there have been so many of them where I've thought there's no way they're that age.

Guy on the right, apparently 48. Looks about 60.

A 40 year-old on the right there.

Another 40 year-old on the left.

41 years-old.

53 years-old

My school year are all 40 now, and half of these people look like they could be their dads/mums.

Also nice to see Humpty Dumpty getting a conviction.

Middle one, third row down, looks like a fat Alan Shearer, when he still had hair.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

BBC says he's 25. But there have been so many of them where I've thought there's no way they're that age.

Guy on the right, apparently 48. Looks about 60.

A 40 year-old on the right there.

Another 40 year-old on the left.

41 years-old.

53 years-old

My school year are all 40 now, and half of these people look like they could be their dads/mums.

Also nice to see Humpty Dumpty getting a conviction.

Definitely grew up in the shallow end of the gene pool that lot.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]