Arsenal have not beaten Spurs yetHow short is your fucking memory?
We smashed Chelsea 4-0 like a week ago, we smashed 6 past United earlier in the season.
Arsenal would need to fuck up but 8 points is far from insurmountable.
Remember 2012??
View attachment 65992
you lose the plot ? no amount of training and talking in the week about not losing your cool can change the fact the worst bit of cheating ever simple
Yes the goal was dodgy, but I think people are papering over the cracks blaming VAR and the officials, we had 1 shot on target, our play is slow and laboured, we are to predictable now for teams, we look miles off the paceyou lose the plot ? no amount of training and talking in the week about not losing your cool can change the fact the worst bit of cheating ever simple
One of the very terrible decisions this season is playing Bernardo on the right whilst having KDB and Gundo in the middle. It’s too easy to cut us open with 1 or 2 passes when we pay like that. It’s a no-no against a very capable counterattacking team. I don’t know how you can’t see this. It’s not like Gundo has been pulling trees.No, you're wrong.
It's not as if they had a stalwart middle as the game played around it anyway. We had no passing lanes through the centre with one option. I don't know why you refuse to see that. De Bruyne was constantly on the wings in the second half, anyway and he was rarely found through the middle in the first half. So, not "suicide" at all.
Having Gundogan would have allowed more vision to the pass through the lines or driving at them. Counterattacking happened with Bernardo in his position today, so why not push him forward to put them on the back foot?
And, since Alvárez pretty much is used to playing on the wing for the national side (and previous clubs) and supporting the striker, it becomes what Foden, Grealish and Mahrez does.
It makes me wonder why you thought having the team as was, was a positive move?
It struck me as cautious and, maybe, overly so for control when the balance could have been that AND with an attacking edge with players not out of form.
Haaland is a fantastic player, but totally understand why Pep wanted Kane. He was more suited to our play. We should have paid the money. We were certainly more set on the eye with the false ‘9‘. Not convinced Pep is getting the players he wants.Back to basics for me... I think we should drop Haaland for a few, go back to false 9.
It was offside but not for this reason. The rules can’t allow for individual players thought processes in the moment, that comes down to game management.Ederson was only concentrating on Rashford, is that enough impact?
I'm not sure a dummy would count, attempting to play the ball would. That should take quite a while to decide on VAR so I've no idea how they decided they didn't need to look at it...thought process.....he dummies and therefore makes eddy look at him....its not just the defenders.
I'm drawn on it tbh, if the tables were turned and we'd scored it we'd all be screaming it should stand.thought process.....he dummies and therefore makes eddy look at him....its not just the defenders. eddy didnt know who was going to shoot.
Yeah, I get that, but with the constant chatter of new challenges and his absolute desire to not play the ball forward....and to think against Crystal Palace he turned the game by attacking attacking attacking..what has happened?!
This is what I've been saying. You can even take the centre half's out of the equation and whether you believe Rashford is 'shielding' the ball or not his presence has brought Ederson out of his goal (anticipating if he takes it in his stride he's through on goal). I went for a piss as was convinced the offside would stand.Surely he is interfering with how Ederson positions himself??
Also Rashford is stood between Akanji and the ball the whole time. If Rashford isn't there City clear it.