liamctid said:
On the whole I tend to agree with the system, but I don't really agree with your post...
I've had a season ticket since I was 11 (12 years ago) but I only started going home and away when I was 18, because before then I couldn't afford it. And I live 160 miles away from CoMs. Since then (last season under Pearce) I've barely missed any games. The most I probably missed was Hughes' last season, but even then it must have been 4 or 5 aways. Not missed one this season, and only missed two last year, but I still had a ticket for Burnley, but was too fucked from a night out to go.
But of course, all this doesn't matter.
I think the rules need to be altered slightly - I don't want to make out like I'm the most best loyal City fan ever, but there's supporters who have about 4/5 years on me. And of course I've got 4/5 years on kids now who are 18. I could fuck off going to City home and away for 2 or 3 years and I'd still have more points that lads going now - which I think is wrong.
i remember when i was you age, 1988-89 i was a 1st year season ticket holder, we drew brentford away in the cup, i had been all over with city that season, but because i was only a 1st year season ticket holder, the tickets sold out to regular season ticket holders, i was gutted at the time, but i couldnt argue, the system at the time rewarded those with season tickets longer than me.
loyalty points recognises the matches you have been to, why should they be nullified because you have to miss a few.
i never understand why if you cannot get in the city end the lack of willingness to go in the home stands, if you want to go, you get in, i have been in the home ends of 20 odd grounds, including every stand at old trafford.