I'd agree with your sentiments about Frankie, but don't see how Malcolm fits in the same bracketPrestwich_Blue said:There's two sides to this actually. As a City fan I obviously love seeing them in trouble and watching the arrogant glory-hunters deserting them.squirtyflower said:Why is that I can detect the glee with every word you type?Prestwich_Blue said:Just reading this:
http://andersred.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/why-have-glazers-changed-their-strategy.html
Glazers look like being screwed financially if this IPO doesn't come off. Seems like they borrowed the $400m to pay off the PIK notes personally and (reading between the lines) the results for 2012 will trigger a penalty clause which will cost them even more money. Oh dear.
As a football fan, I find the notion of people like the Glazers and Shinawatra being allowed to own clubs offensive. They aren't fit and proper in any meaningful sense of the word.
Because they wouldn't be allowed to do to the Tampa Bay Bucs what they've done to the rags, which is to incur debt secured on club assets. People like them destroy football clubs.squirtyflower said:I'd agree with your sentiments about Frankie, but don't see how Malcolm fits in the same bracketPrestwich_Blue said:There's two sides to this actually. As a City fan I obviously love seeing them in trouble and watching the arrogant glory-hunters deserting them.squirtyflower said:Why is that I can detect the glee with every word you type?
As a football fan, I find the notion of people like the Glazers and Shinawatra being allowed to own clubs offensive. They aren't fit and proper in any meaningful sense of the word.
But Platini seems to believe their model is good for football rather than an owner pumping their own cash in and involving the whole community in the benefits of improvementPrestwich_Blue said:Because they wouldn't be allowed to do to the Tampa Bay Bucs what they've done to the rags, which is to incur debt secured on club assets. People like them destroy football clubs.squirtyflower said:I'd agree with your sentiments about Frankie, but don't see how Malcolm fits in the same bracketPrestwich_Blue said:There's two sides to this actually. As a City fan I obviously love seeing them in trouble and watching the arrogant glory-hunters deserting them.
As a football fan, I find the notion of people like the Glazers and Shinawatra being allowed to own clubs offensive. They aren't fit and proper in any meaningful sense of the word.
squirtyflower said:But Platini seems to believe their model is good for football rather than an owner pumping their own cash in and involving the whole community in the benefits of improvement
squirtyflower said:But Platini seems to believe their model is good for football rather than an owner pumping their own cash in and involving the whole community in the benefits of improvementPrestwich_Blue said:Because they wouldn't be allowed to do to the Tampa Bay Bucs what they've done to the rags, which is to incur debt secured on club assets. People like them destroy football clubs.squirtyflower said:I'd agree with your sentiments about Frankie, but don't see how Malcolm fits in the same bracket
The Fat el Hombre said:"It's possible we could bring one more signing in, maybe two more. But probably one."
Tweeted by a mirror journalist
We all know what bacon face is like so I'd take it with a pinch of salt. If true though I think it'd have to be one hell of a signing to keep up with us next year. It's encouraging
manimanc said:How did the glazers pass the fit and proper person test?
We all know the rags are going to sign sneijder,modric,bale,van persie and zlatan twatovic next season and leave us all standing........
Oh.....hang on a minute!!!!