United Thread 2014/15 (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
city2 said:
Did Newcastle a couple of years back have a goal disallowed by tiotte against us, same as the rags tonight

Yes, but it allowed Newcastle to kick the shit out of us with no protection from the ref. tonight just seemed to spur the ref on to giving everything else to them.
 
Didn't watch the end, did the granny shagger get MOTM? Hard to believe they've had one loss in nineteen but even the raggies must be able to see how shit they really are.
 
I just can't wait till we play this long ball merchant fucking shite of a club. We will be purring by then, could be another embarrassment at the theatre of fucking long ball shite.

They can forget about trophy, singing their fucking Wembley songs - Arse will tear them a new one.

Just fuck off you red scum
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
J_Bow said:
Somehow 1 loss in 19 for them.
Credit where it's due. It can't be easy avoiding defeat week in week out.

De Gea is a good keeper that's why - even with todays ricket.
Nice to know that Buthead by his recent comments seems to want to strengthen his midfield rather than the defence.
Laughable. Really laughable.
 
Could it happen again?

wimbledon_682x400_482893a.jpg


No
 
r.soleofsalford said:
BigOscar said:
SPIDERBOY said:
Never a penalty,fellaini shoved the defender......herrera goal was fine IMO......yes rooney was offside,but didn't impede the keepers vision and didn't touch it.
Yes, but the keeper cannot dive untill it passes Rooney as he doesn't know if Rooney is going to touch it or not, he cannot commit untill it's too late. That's the problem with the stupid rule, it's expecting defenders and keepers to be linesman and know who is offisde and somehow adjust their game. You see it all the time where defenders lunge to cut out through passes, taking themselves out the game and losing possession, even though the guy the ball is aimed at is offside. The defender cannot just let it through, as he can't be sure it's offside, but the other team then gains from him having to cut the ball out.




if the ball is going to hit rooney who`s in an offside position and he moves away so it doesnt hit him and therefore goes in the net, surely it is interfering with play by moving out of the way of the ball
I think it was Danny Blanchflower, many years ago, that asked should any player be on the pitch if they were not interfering with play.
 
Rooney did interfere with play. He was part of the move. Ref should have consulted linesman and asked if he was offside. Linesman would have said he was but didn't touch it. Ref should have then said he saw the keeper stall his dive so therefor Rooney dummyied the ball and was part of move. 2nd goal was after a blatant push. 3rd was a dive and a booking for it. Rags cheating their way to trophies since.......well that's another story and too long to write.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.