I couldn't understand the argument he was making last night, we've invested £95 million on pogba £85 million on lukaku all the wages on top of that you've got £120 or £130 million invested in them his exact words, now my maths ain't great but I'm sure them figures add up to more than what he said the thick cnuntFirstly how does he know we were going to be paying him £290,000 per week? I call bullshit on that.
Secondly, if you've agreed a price/wages with someone, then they say actually no i want more, if you agree again what's to stop them adding more on to it?
It's simple really, we were willing to pay Arsenal a fair price at the time and him an extremely good wage, just because we now no longer have to pay Arsenal the same fee doesn't equate to us giving it to him ffs.
www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/01/16/louis-van-gaal-reveals-turned-belgium-job-get-revenge-mean-low/
Louis van Gaal has admitted he turned down the chance to manage Belgium so that he could continue to receive compensation for being sacked by Manchester United.
In an interview with Dutch newspaper Volkskrant, the 66-year-old said he was motivated by 'revenge' in his decision to turn down the role.
After his sacking in July 2016, Van Gaal would have foregone his compensation from Manchester United by taking another a job offer.
"It would have been really great if I had become Belgium national coach, but I was so resentful and vindictive that I let that job go by," said Van Gaal.
"It was stupid, really, because the sporting value should always come in the first place. That should have been the most important thing. But that's how I looked at things. It was not about money. It was all about the act of revenge.
Still get a warm fuzzy feeling for the tactical turtle.
And a sign on fee reportedly being asked by Alexis.
The truth the whole truth and nothing LIKE the truthThis is what goal.com said 2 hours ago...........
The figures bandied around at the moment suggest United are willing to pay Alexis £400,000 per week in wages and signing-on fee of anywhere between £10m and £20m, as well as between £5m and £10m to the agent.
Someone dpesn't seem to be telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Firstly how does he know we were going to be paying him £290,000 per week? I call bullshit on that.
Secondly, if you've agreed a price/wages with someone, then they say actually no i want more, if you agree again what's to stop them adding more on to it?
It's simple really, we were willing to pay Arsenal a fair price at the time and him an extremely good wage, just because we now no longer have to pay Arsenal the same fee doesn't equate to us giving it to him ffs.
I couldn't understand the argument he was making last night, we've invested £95 million on pogba £85 million on lukaku all the wages on top of that you've got £120 or £130 million invested in them his exact words, now my maths ain't great but I'm sure them figures add up to more than what he said the thick cnunt
This is what goal.com said 2 hours ago...........
The figures bandied around at the moment suggest United are willing to pay Alexis £400,000 per week in wages and signing-on fee of anywhere between £10m and £20m, as well as between £5m and £10m to the agent.
Someone dpesn't seem to be telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.