ccr
Well-Known Member
Perhaps a straight swop for Smalling. After all they are both worth 100 million.
I can`t see anything but a Rag win about 0-2, 0-3 as the Magpies really are so shite.away at the barcodes this weekend......
Peg has a poor record there but that means nothing really....Newcastle are shit at present so Id expect utd to win there....
At least spurs play arsenal this weekend so one of them has to drop points....hopefully some sending offs as well and bans.
I can`t see anything but a Rag win about 0-2, 0-3 as the Magpies really are so shite.
So they managed to avoid mentioning the loss then?It was on their website (BBC) all day yesterday :
A rising wage bill for players has cut into the latest quarterly profits from Manchester United.
For the three months to 31 December the club made an operating profit of £28.7m, down 23% on the same period in the previous year.
Wages, which make up half of the club's costs, rose 9.4% to £69.6m.
Players were paid more because Manchester United was back in the Uefa Champions League, but that also meant higher income from TV.
Broadcasting revenue was £61.6m, up 17% on the previous year, with total revenue for the quarter up 3.8% to £163.9m.
As well as Uefa Champions League games, income during the quarter was boosted by two extra Premier League games that were broadcast live.
"Our solid business model has allowed us to invest in the future of the Club with the extension of Jose Mourinho's contract as manager and the acquisition of Alexis Sanchez. We look forward to the remainder of the season with confidence," said Ed Woodward, Executive Vice Chairman of Manchester United.
*other than every ref obviously.There isn't a fucker alive that didn't support them growing up according to the media.
The deceptive bit about that article is that it deals solely with the last quarter's results whereas the loss caused by the reduced US taxation was included in the half-yearly figures which weren't reported in the BBC article but were highlighted in virtually every other media outlet.It was on their website (BBC) all day yesterday :
A rising wage bill for players has cut into the latest quarterly profits from Manchester United.
For the three months to 31 December the club made an operating profit of £28.7m, down 23% on the same period in the previous year.
Wages, which make up half of the club's costs, rose 9.4% to £69.6m.
Players were paid more because Manchester United was back in the Uefa Champions League, but that also meant higher income from TV.
Broadcasting revenue was £61.6m, up 17% on the previous year, with total revenue for the quarter up 3.8% to £163.9m.
As well as Uefa Champions League games, income during the quarter was boosted by two extra Premier League games that were broadcast live.
"Our solid business model has allowed us to invest in the future of the Club with the extension of Jose Mourinho's contract as manager and the acquisition of Alexis Sanchez. We look forward to the remainder of the season with confidence," said Ed Woodward, Executive Vice Chairman of Manchester United.
I can`t be arsed if they use the word LOSS or down.So they managed to avoid mentioning the loss then?
Oh come on ... what do you expect ? ;)The deceptive bit about that article is that it deals solely with the last quarter's results whereas the loss caused by the reduced US taxation was included in the half-yearly figures which weren't reported in the BBC article but were highlighted in virtually every other media outlet.