Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 6,056
In an ideal world the swamp would be named after Citroen,Unilever,National Tyre Services
Wouldn’t you like to see those initials in 10ft high illuminated letters?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Wouldn’t you like to see those initials in 10ft high illuminated letters?
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
I see that in my minds eye anyway when I have the misfortune to ever gaze on the swamp.In an ideal world the swamp would be named after Citroen,Unilever,National Tyre Services
Wouldn’t you like to see those initials in 10ft high illuminated letters?
Loss for the last Quarter but shirt sales, tweets and facebook likes up. What a fucking joke of a club!
@Prestwich_Blue any input on the latest figures?
You just gotta laugh. WOW what a surprise that they are social media winners...haha...with only 659 million sheep in the supporting cast. Apparently the Twitter trophy looks really impressive and it has also been confirmed that there will be an open top bus parade to celebrate next month.
quiet_riot
Well-Known Member
We'll know when they're desperate when they flog the swamps naming rights.
To be honest I'm amazed they haven't done it anyway. Must be worth a fortune.
I've thought for years that the Nike (toilet) Bowl was imminent.
crazyg
Well-Known Member
Stay British. Have the Commercial Union-National Trust Stadium.
malg
Well-Known Member
No, no, no, no, no...........all shirt sales go to the Rags. Someone in work said.He fails to mention they get no extra revenue for those shirt sales.
Silvercloud
Well-Known Member
Must be true that as a lad at my work said the sameNo, no, no, no, no...........all shirt sales go to the Rags. Someone in work said.
Not really, established stadiums have very low value in naming rights. No one calls them by the new name and you get so much hate for doing it that it's value is pretty negligible. New stadiums or ones like ours without an established name are far more valuable as it becomes the actual name. Just look at the farce up at NewcastleWe'll know when they're desperate when they flog the swamps naming rights.
To be honest I'm amazed they haven't done it anyway. Must be worth a fortune.
Not really, established stadiums have very low value in naming rights. No one calls them by the new name and you get so much hate for doing it that it's value is pretty negligible. New stadiums or ones like ours without an established name are far more valuable as it becomes the actual name. Just look at the farce up at Newcastle
They should build a new stadium down saarth.
Honestly wouldn't be surprised if the Glazers had looked into the financials of that. They literally couldn't give a shit about football or United, if they could make more money moving to China, they'd do it without thinking twiceThey should build a new stadium down saarth.
whitenoise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 1,144
Can't find anything about this on the BBC website. Is Mr Stone on holiday today or is he googling "polish a turd" ?
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 16,683
They should build a new stadium down saarth.
Or a bunch of stadiums around the country and rotate, a bit like Lancs in the cricket.
jaymcfc1968
Active Member
Tweet from Infamous Diner in the City Centre:
CITEH take on Leicester on Saturday, 5:30PM
.
Pre-match burgers & shakes are never a bad idea Pre-booking advised: infamousdiner.co.uk #Infamousdiner #manchester #nq #gameday #weekendvibes #eatmcr #mcruk
Boycott this place.
CITEH take on Leicester on Saturday, 5:30PM
.
Pre-match burgers & shakes are never a bad idea Pre-booking advised: infamousdiner.co.uk #Infamousdiner #manchester #nq #gameday #weekendvibes #eatmcr #mcruk
Boycott this place.
Not really, established stadiums have very low value in naming rights. No one calls them by the new name and you get so much hate for doing it that it's value is pretty negligible. New stadiums or ones like ours without an established name are far more valuable as it becomes the actual name. Just look at the farce up at Newcastle
Generally speaking, I'd agree. But Old Trafford might be a special case, not least the news coverage. It'd go down like a cup of cold sick though, which is why they've not done it yet.
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Boycott,I’d torch the fucking place ...Tweet from Infamous Diner in the City Centre:
CITEH take on Leicester on Saturday, 5:30PM
.
Pre-match burgers & shakes are never a bad idea Pre-booking advised: infamousdiner.co.uk #Infamousdiner #manchester #nq #gameday #weekendvibes #eatmcr #mcruk
Boycott this place.
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Fans would be so opposed to changing the name of the swamp that thousands would threaten to leave and form their own new club.Generally speaking, I'd agree. But Old Trafford might be a special case, not least the news coverage. It'd go down like a cup of cold sick though, which is why they've not done it yet.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 30,198
United loose £49m in last 6 months.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...9m-loss-donald-trumps-overhaul-us-tax-system/
I thought I was good at maths but this one has me stumped. I know it's an accounting charge - that could be for many things - but how can they blame it on Trump for paying less tax? Sorry it just doesn't compute.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...9m-loss-donald-trumps-overhaul-us-tax-system/
I thought I was good at maths but this one has me stumped. I know it's an accounting charge - that could be for many things - but how can they blame it on Trump for paying less tax? Sorry it just doesn't compute.
Last edited:
basokla
Well-Known Member
Just a guess but I’m thinking the taxes paid to US (due to being listed in the US market) were used as a way to reduce operating income in the UK. Once the tax liability in the US was reduced the income increased for purposes of UK taxes due. And probably at a higher tax rate.
But like I said, just a guess. I really have no idea how entities with foreign ownership are taxed in the UK.
But like I said, just a guess. I really have no idea how entities with foreign ownership are taxed in the UK.
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 6,666
How surprising that he BBC has been remarkably quiet about this story. It's been sidelined to the gossip column. Maybe they haven't made a loss and it's just tittle tattle?
lancs blue
Well-Known Member
I think it's related to "double taxation" policy, apparently there is tax relief available in the UK if tax is paid in the US - subject to HMRC's conditions. Details here if anyone fancies untangling them.Just a guess but I’m thinking the taxes paid to US (due to being listed in the US market) were used as a way to reduce operating income in the UK. Once the tax liability in the US was reduced the income increased for purposes of UK taxes due. And probably at a higher tax rate.
But like I said, just a guess. I really have no idea how entities with foreign ownership are taxed in the UK.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/double-taxation-relief/dt19853a
- Status
- Not open for further replies.