laughing gravy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 907
dont forget bacon face's days were numbered too,but for a slice of luck..that would have been every manager sacked in the last 50 years, the true united way
Do you actually watch football???
Ffs mate they are fucking wank...not a question of blue glasses it's a case of being able to see what see and not get sucked into the media hype.. I suggest you give it a try...watch from your armchair without the volume on and make your own judgement.
Err, I think you'll find Jose is the biggest shit, has been and mercenary. He certainly is no scapegoat
I'm not defending him at all. I hate him and all he stands for.
All I'm saying is in this current crisis the rag loving media have just about laid the entire blame at his door and conveniently ignored all the other wider problems with the club, it's owners, it's transfer policy and the fact that virtually all the current squad of players are simply not good enough regardless of who manages them or what style/tactics they attempt.
Indeed, but you could say Jimmy Bullard could come out of retirement and develop here. Literally any player coming into our set up would be richer for it.
Martial I do believe would thrive in our system with a manager who isn't a twat.
Pogba definitely would, but he's a left winger that thinks he isn't. My thing with him and this isn't being an arse, but he'd be Delph at left back if he was here under Pep. That's where he'd be fit in, not in the middle and he isn't the type of winger for us.
Even Bailly and Lindelof would be better here.
All of the foreign players I mentioned have undoubted technical talent.
But on Rashford and Lingard, they are unbelievably overrated and it shocks me how some buy into it.
So more City managers have won the title than United ones...
It is 100% the club. It is what 30 years of success did to them. It blinded them and made them arrogant which (as it always does) bites you on the arse.
City need to carefully watch the demise of Utd and learn from them if we want to escape the same fate as we develop and grow.
Well, i don't watch united lol, but what i have seen of the two of them i think i see two players who are held beck by the manager and the squads they play in.
I don't go for digital opinions, so i think there is a bit of ground between fucking wank and fucking amazing. As they stand, they are decent enough. Under Pep i think they would be very good.
I think that our owner and his board have shown far greater understanding of how to run a club,than the pricks from America.HH has already put into place "self sufficient" policies which are working very well,we have a transfer strategy that has seen some wonderful talents coming into our club and long gone are the days of mercenaries arriving for more than cash alone,but to want to win trophies.It is 100% the club. It is what 30 years of success did to them. It blinded them and made them arrogant which (as it always does) bites you on the arse.
City need to carefully watch the demise of Utd and learn from them if we want to escape the same fate as we develop and grow.
Neville talks quite a bit of sense at times but he's clearly talking bollocks here. The evidence is there for all to see - United have sacked every single manager since WW2 except Busby and Ferguson, and if it wasn't for the huge amount of success those 2 achieved they'd have sacked a whole lot more, and that includes Ferguson until City fan Mark Robins famously saved his bacon (pardon the pun) in January 1990.
Was funny as fuck seeing the City fan call Neville out on Twitter for sacking 4 managers at Salford City in the past few years!
So, is it the manager or the way the club is structured? They always seem to want a dictator, someone who runs the club from top to bottom and the guys who own the club just take the money. Football has changed though and players call the tune now, is that why the club so often gets it wrong with appointing new management? Ive a feeling it dont matter what happens to Mourinho or who is appointed when he finally goes, its doomed to failure (which is success from my point of view).
I'd be slightly concerned with Zidane being appointed not because he's a great manager but because he is a tremendous pull for a whole generation of (especially French, but not exclusively) footballers. He obviously didn't buy a ton at Madrid because of the squad he inherited but given the comical wages and transfer fees United throw around they could bring in some serious talent very quickly. Even if Zidane doesn't work out as a manager with a little bit of luck they could easily rehabilitate themselves over the next summer or two.
Captain Kirk on the bridge of the Enterprise was not happy --
Literally addressed that in my postWhere has Zidane proved himself capable of building a squad?
Literally addressed that in my post