It’s a right wing political magazine which used to be edited by the current Prime Minister, running a smear campaign against someone who publicly embarrassed the current Prime Minister.Sorry, maybe I should have said the “right-wing press” instead. If you don’t think this Spectator piece will be politically motivated though then that’s up to you.
My innate sense of modesty makes me hesitate before taking credit, or being the centre of attention, but it was me.As @gordondaviesmoustache (I think) said recently, that’s such a wank sobriquet. Obviously I had to Google what it meant first (sobriquet that is, not wank).
As it’s a borrowed French word @Blue Mist probably spells it sob rick ehAs @gordondaviesmoustache (I think) said recently, that’s such a wank sobriquet. Obviously I had to Google what it meant first (sobriquet that is, not wank).
Thought it was Breton, I’ll not googleAs it’s a borrowed French word @Blue Mist probably spells it sob rick eh
Or sod ric eh :-)As it’s a borrowed French word @Blue Mist probably spells it sob rick eh
No shit he's "benefited commercially". Through his good works he's (deservedly) received way more fame and attention than he would've otherwise, and all that translates into endorsements and whatever else. Ask the hungry kids who've gotten meals because of him if they care.Article coming out tomorrow from the Spectator about Saint Marcus and how he has allegedly benefited commercially from all his campaigns over the last 18 months.
Be interesting to read.
My memory was that Anelka almost caught the ball and knocked it to the Goat who duly scored. It thought it was handball at the time but it didn't stop me going bugshit with the other 3,000 of us in the swamp.It was ruled out for handball, the ball just brushed his hand (accidentally) before he put it in the net.
Fucking jammy red twats!!!
He didn't ''literally feed thousands of children'' at all... his PR/social media team campaigned for the government to use taxpayers money to provide food for children of feckless parents, tax payer money from workers who earn a fraction of what he earns, and he did it whilst employing various methods to avoid paying the full tax liabilities on his own immense earnings.People profit from things a lot worse. If he has profited who cares? He deserves it!
He literally fed thousands of children within the last year and made sure they didn't go hungry. That obviously makes him far more marketable and profitable.
We all know the real reasons he's being attacked.
Don't care he's a United player, he's a very decent person and a credit to this country and this city.
Was a poor attempt at humour re the banning thing mate. Didn’t wanna come across as a twat but as someone who doesn’t particularly care about any political party it does get very tiresome to read political jibes from both sides seemingly in most threads these days.Exactly, and Rashford isn’t really one of them. *why would I ban you for that?*