johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,566
It was all looking so good.....
It is a disgrace especially when there is 19 other teams in the league but they let him have a platform to push the narrative of Glazers are bad for the rags,surprisingly they don’t seem to have cottoned on that subscribers are cancelling sky over not just the price but the continuing fawning of anything no matter how small of the rags ..This is like asking "do bears shit in the woods".
Of course he'll be on his platform boring to death subscription paying supporters of other football clubs with his woes.
It's predictably boring from Sly sports that every week of every season they are trying to spoonfeed their audience on all things Man utd.
Pathetic man working for a Pathetic company
That's a fair assessment. He is also judged on his one or two games a season when everything clicks for him and he actually looks decent. But in reality he is averaging 9 league goals a season.
Funny to think that the only points they’ve got have been from incredibly fortunate wins against notts forest and wolves
It would be truly delicious.I bet you (rightly) thought we'd never win the league back in the day.
Hang on in there, good things come to those who wait.
He also said ‘this is no fun….’Tide may be turning against Ten Hag in terms of support from match-going fans, if noise at the substitutions yesterday was anything to go by. When he goes - probably this season, unless results pick up - those ‘fans’ will say that Ten Hag failed because the job was too big for him. They’d be right. You could bring in Ferrán, Pep and Txiki and tear up the FFP rule-book while you’re at it, and it still wouldn’t work, because they need a Total Reset at levels a CEO, a director of football and a head coach can’t reach. They need to start acting like what they are - a top-half-of-the-table Big City club - like Aston Villa, say - but with a squad of overpaid and untalented misfits, who were hired by a succession of managers, who are on contracts too long to manage and wages too high to walk away from, with a decaying old-school stadium that generates no income from other sources and which can’t be improved, who when they lose a game - as all teams in their position do - should be graceful in defeat and admit they were beaten by the better team in order to dial down the media heat, rather than feel the constant need to keep that heat at boiling point by going on about a home defeat to Brighton as if the national flood defences had failed or there’d been a run on the banks, and who should publicly acknowledge that they’re just another club, that what they won 30 years ago has no bearing on next week’s game, and that the weight of expectation (“this is Manchester United we’re talking about”) is crushing everything they’re trying to do.
Ten Hag is not a bad coach - he’s up there with Luis Enrique, Klopp, Nagelsmann & Tuchel in the best-of-the-rest bunch. But he’s not working miracles, so he’ll have to go. Rinse, and repeat.
As John Lydon sang all those years ago: “and it’s all falling to bits…gloriously!”
Stretford StrangewaysThe dickhead Stuart Hall used to refer to the swamp as the Theatre of Dreams in his post-match reports on Radio 5, but I'm not sure if that's the original reference.
I used to call him "neckless".Gladstone Small.
I only recall hearing Stuart Hall referring to it as the Theatre of Dreams, then others within United like the pisscan - after he got some success - started calling it the same, as did sycophantic pundits - while Maine Road was the Theatre of Base Comedy.I was going to bring this up... I only started noticing that silly theatre name being used probably mid-late 90's, which I assume to be all part of the commercialised hyperbole that came with the advent of the PL, can any oldies confirm if the silly theatre name had been in use much longer than that, ie back in the 60's or 70's, or is it just a modern invention created by the rag loving media?