This place is full of FOCs like me. We watched our tiny irrelevant club losing for 30 years.Stop thinking that everyone is a dyed in the wool fan who only want to watch if their team is winning. They aren’t.
This place is full of FOCs like me. We watched our tiny irrelevant club losing for 30 years.Stop thinking that everyone is a dyed in the wool fan who only want to watch if their team is winning. They aren’t.
The media are so much up Uniteds arse and have been for years that it will take years before pricks like Sean Curtis are binned off and the only one who is relatively unbiased is Martin Samuels. Holt and the rest are just spouting rag shite for clicks as rag want to know what’s going on and the rest of us want to revel in their downfallThe uk media have their red shirted darlings - I would have thought that was obvious. The FOC’s on here know it’s been like this since the television age began, just see the coverage (lack) of City playing and winning the ECWC.
If you ingest City/red shirt information in the prism of the uk media, then it’s hopefully blindingly obvious where their sympathies and bias lie. The daily Mail football section for example have 10 clubs crests (including euro clubs) with links on that take you to that clubs news. City’s link takes you to the United newsreel…
If you opened your eyes , you’d see the streets are populated by kids in City shirts, especially with Haaland on the back. The same is true for youth football teams. The same is true round the world - with the exception of Africa (Chelsea & Arsenal stronghold).
The only places that City aren’t THE club to notice, are in heartlands of red shirted fans and the UK media.
City - dominating the premier league, birthday cake, jelly and ice cream for over a decade.Birthday parties on his birthday. Whatever next?
Think you are shouting in the wind with this argument.I asked when you posted this before but you didn't answer. Just like you don't answer anybody who questions your narrative. How do you explain TV money going through the roof in the last 10 years when the dominant team by far is not the rags or your old lot?
On those wages? Good luckMate of a mate who knows somebody at the shit tip says they want rid of Rashford……..
Nice article from Samuels this week demonstrating in detail how Ten Bob has got absolutely everything wrong at the rags.The media are so much up Uniteds arse and have been for years that it will take years before pricks like Sean Curtis are binned off and the only one who is relatively unbiased is Martin Samuels. Holt and the rest are just spouting rag shite for clicks as rag want to know what’s going on and the rest of us want to revel in their downfall
Well, it is the Christmas season after all...Would be surprised they would be looking at 70M plus .
More like 35 IMO
Firs sale starts here
I’ll answer for the ****, they stopped winning, he stopped going, plastic out of towner took on his tickets.Liverpool certainly didn't have your loyalty did they ?? why are you in fact 'Ex Liverpool' ?
2/1 BirdseyeView attachment 97645
Where will Marcus go next
3/1 PSG
5/1 Real Madrid
8/1 James Martin Restaurant Manchester
11/1 Saudi Arabia
11/1 Gordon Ramsay Sous Chef
Oh you mean gloryhunters ?? Oh I get it now..Liverpool and united are the top earners because of their fans who only support them cos they're established winners... Please enlighten this board as to how you became an ex Liverpool supporter??Have to disagree.. Crystal Palace knocking United or Liverpool off there perch by winning a League would be a massive turn off unless you are a Palace supporter.. like I say people want to be associated with winning brands.. if you were selling tv rights to Bangkok or Malaysia how would you get the premium price for it if West Ham were top dogs when three quarters of your population would probably support either United or Liverpool, they wouldn’t pay to watch West Ham dominate no way.