You missed the point. The profit was made by old man Glazer’s investment, not his sons.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread - 2023/24
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,655
You missed the point. The profit was made by old man Glazer’s investment, not his sons.
Old man Glazer died in 2014 & the sons have continued the great work…. I won’t have a word said against them ;-)
If it came to the crunch, the US investors would join forces with the two Glazers who want to sell and Ineos. They could outvote the two Glazer directors.I’m still unclear of the strategy you are describing. I assume it’s a hostile takeover of some sort but how is it going to play out?
jimharri
Moderator
Not a fan then?She's got 76 n' half thousand followers, that's as many zombies as Manure get turning up every other week, fuck me senseless with a big bath loofah! By the time she reaches her menopause there'll be millions of zombies following the miserable moaning moo head! I'll hopefully be dead by then though and god willing united will still be as shite or even more shite, please !
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,655
If it came to the crunch, the US investors would join forces with the two Glazers who want to sell and Ineos. They could outvote the two Glazer directors.
I don’t understand why they’d sell for less than they could sell to the Glazers.
One thing I am certain is that if scruffy jim improves the value they’ll borrow against it.
Dirty Harry
Well-Known Member
I thought it was her topless too :-SAre they still going on about how many points they are behind us ? :-)
Just found this on my phone
25% of 69 is not 14.Ratcliffe has not bought 25% of the club.
The glazers owned 69% of the club and Ratcliffe has bought 25% of that. So if my maths are correct he actually only owns 14% of the club and paid £1.2B for the privilege
Hmmm……maybe but we’re speculating about the Glazers blocking Uncle Jim. Not sure the Glazers could put together the funds to buy others out. More likely the Arabs are sitting there and waiting….I don’t understand why they’d sell for less than they could sell to the Glazers.
One thing I am certain is that if scruffy jim improves the value they’ll borrow against it.
When the Glazer family split that caused the delay in reaching this settlement; for me that is significant, ie two Glazers still want out.
For Hicks and Gillette read the Glazers.Definitely back again, the BBC says it's the start of a new era! A new fucking era indeed, they are the new liverpool
It’s complex, but: The A shares are the ones on the NYSE, the B shares are the originals.This is true to a point, he has however bought 25% of the voting rights of the club as the A shares, those held by the hoi-poloi have no voting rights and are in effect useless in terms of running the club
The. A shares do have voting rights but not one for one.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.