Think they've missed a decimal point out.106m for Rashford.
In terms of taking the rags to the cleaners, Pogba and Martial are fucking legends.
Strange article, gives a table of those player values, which all seem ridiculously inflated. Then analyses several including Rashford and notably Anthony and produces much lower realistic valuations.106m for Rashford.
You've done the same as me before I was corrected, associated the table with the dialogue, but they're actually unconnected data, the table is CIES and the dialogue is Transfermarkt. Poor page design.Strange article, gives a table of those player values, which all seem ridiculously inflated. Then analyses several including Rashford and notably Anthony and produces much lower realistic valuations.
I see, about as clear as mud then. The CIES values still seem massively overated to me.You've done the same as me before I was corrected, associated the table with the dialogue, but they're actually unconnected data, the table is CIES and the dialogue is Transfermarkt. Poor page design.
The BBC haven't "worked with" anybody - as per their blurb - they've just copied and pasted from the 2 sources then displayed them differently. I would have merged the two sets of valuations into one table to make it clear.
I doubt he's doing from the cost prospective, it's more about the principle and corporate bonding aspect shirley not.Yep, I bet the players, fergie etc. are shitting it now with the staff being charged £20 to go on the coach to the final.
Isn't that what they call ' a fire sale '...usually 10% of the value at best.If you are basically admitting you are desperate to sell you won’t get a premium price for your, ahem, stars.
Plus who’ll match the eye watering wages some of them are on. Even the most flash Saudi wouldn’t spend much on Sir Fish Finger
Same as, lol.I doubt he's doing from the cost prospective, it's more about the principle and corporate bonding aspect shirley not.
and what the fuck do I know about corporate bonding......