dadnlad
Well-Known Member
no they hoped we'd have give up and gone so rules could be scrappedThey've even managed to fuck up on their own rules.
no they hoped we'd have give up and gone so rules could be scrappedThey've even managed to fuck up on their own rules.
erm haven't united massively breached PRS then with those quarter accounts, even prior to the final quarter results in the PRS 3-year cycle (barring a frankly unbelievable humongous profit in the final quarter to end of June 2024)?
Adding the £71m loss to the existing figures:
View attachment 124872
115+28+71 = £214m loss + the final quarter's loss still to be added, so they are already DOUBLE the allowable PRS 3-year loss, and only have a quarter to find £ 109m+ behind the sofa?!?
It's all boiling down to selling the naming rights at the swamp, a final roll of the dice with the chips stacked against them.Creative accounting will kick in to get round this, if Chelsea can sell off hotels to themselves the rags will be looking at assets they can shift at an inflated price to themselves. Clubs will know they are desperate and resist bids for their players putting the price up, flip side the rags need to move players on which will result in some low ball offers. They really are fucked which is delicious to see.
So, I guess that means they won’t be bringing in the talent needed to rejuvenate the squad.
And let’s face it, there’s not a great deal of match day income in the second half of May and June, but they’ll have the same outgoings.erm haven't united massively breached PRS then with those quarter accounts, even prior to the final quarter results in the PRS 3-year cycle (barring a frankly unbelievable humongous profit in the final quarter to end of June 2024)?
Adding the £71m loss to the existing figures:
View attachment 124872
115+28+71 = £214m loss + the final quarter's loss still to be added, so they are already DOUBLE the allowable PRS 3-year loss, and only have a quarter to find £ 109m+ behind the sofa?!?
they'll get them for half their true valueSo, I guess that means they won’t be bringing in the talent needed to rejuvenate the squad.
What a fucking shame!
erm haven't united massively breached PRS then with those quarter accounts, even prior to the final quarter results in the PRS 3-year cycle (barring a frankly unbelievable humongous profit in the final quarter to end of June 2024)?
Adding the £71m loss to the existing figures:
View attachment 124872
115+28+71 = £214m loss + the final quarter's loss still to be added, so they are already DOUBLE the allowable PRS 3-year loss, and only have a quarter to find £ 109m+ behind the sofa?!?
And let’s face it, there’s not a great deal of match day income in the second half of May and June, but they’ll have the same outgoings.
That would be in the quarter AFTER the end of June 2024 one, so irrelevant to PRS for the 3-year period up to June 2024 :-)they just added £35million for sale of Greenwood ??? that is a joke for somebody with zero value to the club