United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.



Wow!
WOW indeed.
 
Wow

The rags saying he didnt do it

While we were unable to access certain evidence for reasons we respect, the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with.

Why would you sack someone when you believe they didnt commit the acts he was charged with ?

What a joke of a club. So on what grounds are they sacking him if utd dont think he did anything wrong ? You cant just sack someone !
 
I just read the utd statement as saying we didn't have all the facts but had a bit more than got put in public domain, and on that basis believe MG was not guilty.
Enough to put doubt in a few peoples minds, so they can ship him out on loan to inflate his value for when they sell him in a season or two.

The Greenwood statement is a disgrace.
 
I just read the utd statement as saying we didn't have all the facts but had a bit more than got put in public domain, and on that basis believe MG was not guilty.
Enough to put doubt in a few peoples minds, so they can ship him out on loan to inflate his value for when they sell him in a season or two.

The Greenwood statement is a disgrace.

On the pictures she posted of what he had done to her with blood streaming down her face which got into the public domain. What evidence do they have to counter that? She had fallen down the stairs?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.