A nailed on yellow for Grealish that!You reckon Grealish gets that pen?
The annoying thing is though you can sit watching a rag game and predict what is coming up next, dodgy penalties and kicking fuck out of the opposition with impunity and any contentious offsides will only go one way. Strange isn’t it?This is obviously true but is irrelevant to the point that United have had two (three?) potentially game-winning decisions go their way in two home games: one leading to an apology, and the others leading to the other team to consider an official complaint. Or is that a biased view?
"See what you want to see loons"? That's a bit disrespectful. People are asking "How is that not offside?" That's a reasonable question to ask, given that the person who scored is clearly in an offside position when a United player plays the ball forward - see images.How was that not offside? Err coz it wasn't
Rashford there was no contact! Err there was
Pmsl at some of the see what you want to see loons on here.
Anyhow for the sane the penalty was soft but are given regularly because refs find it impossible to determine what is sufficient contact. The rags have more points than what there performances deserve, they are very average so far this season.
It’s quite simple."See what you want to see loons"? That's a bit disrespectful. People are asking "How is that not offside?" That's a reasonable question to ask, given that the person who scored is clearly in an offside position when a United player plays the ball forward - see images.
Instead of answering "Err coz it wasn't", please explain why, under the current Laws of the Game, it wasn't given as offside.
Thank you Colin, Mr Macawber would be shaking his head in disbelief at such behaviour.It's simple. Their operating expenses are more than their revenue. It's like you or me earning £2.5k a month and spending 3k. And that's before they spend any money on players.
They can shove their apologies up their bent arses,as the fact these incidents keep happening,at the same ground(s) and in favour of the same team(s),means their words mean fuck all.......its purely lip service as we are being treated like fucking idiots.
I thought it offside at first though not from the phase of play you've highlighted. As the player your referring to was not the intended recipient of the pass and Fernandez (onside) was I think thats ok.. However I did think Casemiro might have been when Fernandez headed it back.... but maybe not."See what you want to see loons"? That's a bit disrespectful. People are asking "How is that not offside?" That's a reasonable question to ask, given that the person who scored is clearly in an offside position when a United player plays the ball forward - see images.
Instead of answering "Err coz it wasn't", please explain why, under the current Laws of the Game, it wasn't given as offside.
as brian clough said , if you arent active you shouldnt be on the pitch, also have you seen casemiro run, if hes in an onside position when that ball is played he never gets anywhere near that ball so arguably he gains an advantage by being there.It’s quite simple.
Casemiro is not active when the ball is clipped to Fernandes.
When he becomes active, he is behind the ball.
This isn’t my opinion; this is the laws of the game.