United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
WesthoughtonJohn said:
So on that basis CFG should be used by us - no????
Just funnel all the money through the other clubs - oh wait in our case that's not within the rules.
What an absolute crock of shit
Click to expand...

That's the point I don't understand ? How can your owners put their own money into the club from 2 different companies? I thought they changed the rules to limit the amount from only one account only
 
hertsblue said:
If the BBC have finally confirmed what we all know, that he is the Rags PR man, can we not ban him from our press conferences and ask for th BBC employee responsible for our club to attend.
The fact he has the role of chief football reporter and chose to ignore the European Final involving Chelsea to jelly off abroad on a pointless friendly for the Rags sums him up.
And how is this pointless friendly a key event. Guarantee we won't have a BBC member with us for the CWC (thank god)
Click to expand...
☆This ☆
 
Tracking back said:
Blimey!

Imagine where the rags would be plying their trade if the playing field was leveled out.
Click to expand...
Well Masters the corrupt bastard has given them enough time to get things back on track by using us as a smoke and mirrors diversion, but the wankers running it are so incompetent that it'll never be in Fergies lifetime.
 
"Everybody is looking at the New York company - Manchester United plc but there is another company called Red Football which is owned by the Glazers and that is forming the basis of the PSR calculation.

"The losses at Red Football Ltd are far lower than they are at Manchester United plc so therefore the extent of the damage is far less than originally envisaged."

www.bbc.co.uk

Bryan Mbeumo transfer news: How can Man Utd afford Brentford striker?

Manchester United have delved into the transfer market despite no European football next season. BBC Sport looks at how they can fund their big-money signings.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
jrb said:
"Everybody is looking at the New York company - Manchester United plc but there is another company called Red Football which is owned by the Glazers and that is forming the basis of the PSR calculation.

"The losses at Red Football Ltd are far lower than they are at Manchester United plc so therefore the extent of the damage is far less than originally envisaged."

www.bbc.co.uk

Bryan Mbeumo transfer news: How can Man Utd afford Brentford striker?

Manchester United have delved into the transfer market despite no European football next season. BBC Sport looks at how they can fund their big-money signings.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
So, if I get this correct, the rags have two owners or is it three? If the get three then they can go even further into debt and still pass PSR!!
 
So basically it turns out that the Glaziers are actually their financial saviours?
Saving them from financial ruin and points deductions?
Ah well, I look forward to the grovelling public apologies from MUST, Neville and them 1958 throbbers
Plus the Moston tribute act will surely have to liquidate their self righteous ego trip?
 
hertsblue said:
If the BBC have finally confirmed what we all know, that he is the Rags PR man, can we not ban him from our press conferences and ask for th BBC employee responsible for our club to attend.
The fact he has the role of chief football reporter and chose to ignore the European Final involving Chelsea to jelly off abroad on a pointless friendly for the Rags sums him up.
And how is this pointless friendly a key event. Guarantee we won't have a BBC member with us for the CWC (thank god)
Click to expand...
Excellent point about Stone being at our press conferences. For some bizarre reason he always gets the first question. Where he usually asks a question not relevant to the reason for the conference. Then he doesn't write about his question or the answer given. Now the BBC has confirmed what he we already knew, that he's only there as a shit stirring red fanboy he should be banned.
 
Gingers Dad said:
Excellent point about Stone being at our press conferences. For some bizarre reason he always gets the first question. Where he usually asks a question not relevant to the reason for the conference. Then he doesn't write about his question or the answer given. Now the BBC has confirmed what he we already knew, that he's only there as a shit stirring red fanboy he should be banned.
Click to expand...
Just wait until Magic Hat is installed as our dedicated reporter.
 
Scaley said:
one of the talking points in the world of football has been Manchester United's post-season tour to Asia, which stood out amongst the calendars of all other Premier League clubs”.

That’s some seriously delusional shite right there.
Click to expand...
The only reason it’s been one of the talking points in world football is because it’s been plastered over BBC football for the last couple of weeks.
 
Gingers Dad said:
Excellent point about Stone being at our press conferences. For some bizarre reason he always gets the first question. Where he usually asks a question not relevant to the reason for the conference. Then he doesn't write about his question or the answer given. Now the BBC has confirmed what he we already knew, that he's only there as a shit stirring red fanboy he should be banned.
Click to expand...
Or Pep to make the **** squirm……..
 
stevemacca said:
Like many I complained about the extensive Simon Stone coverage onthe BBC and received this reply , probably similar to many others on here

'Thanks for contacting us about the BBC Sport website.

Simon's role is to report on Manchester United for BBC Sport. He is one of a group of senior journalists that cover specific Premier League clubs for us. And we're currently advertising more roles to further widen this pool. As you would expect, part of Simon's role is to cover key events involving Manchester United, and this is the same as our other writers following their assigned club at key times.

We can assure you, that we’re always mindful of the costs and finances behind putting together our output, while at the same time trying to provide the best possible service to our audiences.

Recently, with the season having almost drawn to a conclusion, one of the talking points in the world of football has been Manchester United's post-season tour to Asia, which stood out amongst the calendars of all other Premier League clubs. The tour had prompted much discussion and debate, with the team flying to Malaysia almost immediately after their final match of the season.

In this context, we felt it was newsworthy for our audience to feature an insight into the tour's progress. The tour wasn't without incident, and saw several widely talked about moments, including an open top bus tour before United's loss to ASEAN All Stars, where the team were booed off by a large proportion of a 70,000-plus crowd. Amad Diallo was pictured giving an obscene gesture to fans, there was speculation and tension around Alejandro Garnacho's future, and we were able to gain access to several press conferences and interviews.'

With all of this in mind, we feel this brought value to audiences, but we recognise you may continue to disagree.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. We’ve discussed your concerns with the team at BBC Sport, which helps inform decisions about current and future content.
Click to expand...
I had the same reply.
Need to work out how to take this to the next level
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top