United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
r.soleofsalford said:
I went in walkden fish bar where I have on going banter with the 2 United fans who work there. I asked it they were looking forward to Saturdays relegation battle with Southampton.

The rags I have a pop at are all very quiet I think they fear the worst.
Click to expand...
Are they the Cypriot lads? The lad that runs it gets proper depressed at the mention of the Rags, great fish in there.
 
Protein Junkie said:
Their long standing debt is only £496.52m plus add ons says Slyman Stone. That’s plus £35.6m and £30m.
So it’s over £562m really :-)
Looking forward to the BBC HYS on this.
Click to expand...
You'll be waiting a long time.
Even if the paedo protectors did allow comments, anything that doesn't blow smoke up the rags arses would be deleted.
 
manimanc said:
Hmm sky sports news still not got it on their app.

We had the full shabang with these bitter twats when news broke about the 115. Yellow ticker tape, top story, whistles and bells the lot.

Not so much as a hint of it on their app.

It's not a shock anymore how they behave towards us and them and yep it fuckin winds me up as much as I don't want to admit it.

Pisspoor sports media outlet.
Click to expand...
The simple solution is to get IPTV and not to give Sly a penny.
Best thing I ever did with the added bonus of bring able to watch away games on a foreign stream without a hint of Spitty or Ratboy.
 
KentBlue said:
This is all just confirmation that they receive favourable treatment, and have done for 30-odd years. On and off the pitch they do just as they want while the rest of us have to obey the rules.

I find it incredible that no other club in the entire history of the Premier league has ever queried this - or if they have why aren't the media bringing it to our attention? We know the BBC and Sly are on the side of the vermin, but surely not ALL media outlets are so biased as to let a major storyline like this go without having a sniff around??
Click to expand...

The Agenda Thread will be chuckling in it’s grave.
 
So the Rags post losses of 113m today
42.1m in 22/23
And 115.5m in 21/22

So that’s 170m in losses against an allowance of 105m but the media are on message - it’s not a problem. What a joke our media and football regulators are… one rule for one and one for the rest. How would you feel as a Forest or an Everton fan reading this narrative.
 
You can bet your life that they will claim the £75 million in exceptions they were recently granted were for the season 2022 - 2023, this way they will still fall into the next 3 year period when they publish the year end accounts. Even so they will have to find another £75 million, They can claim against infrastructure costs, i would love to know what that includes, can they claim back against the new senior management team? Berrada, Wilcox, Ashworth and so on?
 
when you can lose money for 5 years in a row to the tune of £350 million and pass PROFIT and SUSTAINABILliTY rules, it suggests those rules aren’t working

Imagine having your business accounts audited, you’ve lost money for 5 years straight and them going ‘yeah this looks sustainable. Your repeated loss of money makes us feel comfortable in your long term profit’
 
Just for a bit of context of the figures involved, they have lost £255 million over a 3 year period

According to Delloites, for the season 2022 - 2023, this is the revenue of some established PL teams.

So they basically lost more over 3 seasons than the annual turnover of each of these teams below.

But move on, nothing to see here,

1726078811984.png
 
Scaley said:
Are they the Cypriot lads? The lad that runs it gets proper depressed at the mention of the Rags, great fish in there.
Click to expand...

Yep I see Mario the most I wind him up a lot.

And yes great fish, I use to drive from Ellenbrook to the chippy next to Mary D’s but the walkden fish bar is close to being as good as. I know the chippy next to Mary D’s has shut now but his brother is still open I believe.
 
Protein Junkie said:
Their long standing debt is only £496.52m plus add ons says Slyman Stone. That’s plus £35.6m and £30m.
So it’s over £562m really :-)
Looking forward to the BBC HYS on this.
Click to expand...
If even the Qataris couldn't establish just how big united's debt was despite engaging the services of the best auditors and forensic accountants available as part of a multi-billion pound proposed takeover... I'd love to know how that snivelling little no nowt is able to so confidently report that figure as being truthful and accurate.

But there again he gets to operate under the vile BBC's interpretation of what's truthful and accurate.
 
mike1923 said:
when you can lose money for 5 years in a row to the tune of £350 million and pass PROFIT and SUSTAINABILliTY rules, it suggests those rules aren’t working

Imagine having your business accounts audited, you’ve lost money for 5 years straight and them going ‘yeah this looks sustainable. Your repeated loss of money makes us feel comfortable in your long term profit’
Click to expand...

Imagine being that shit at the money side AND being 14th in the league.

Massive.
 
hertsblue said:
Stinks of corruption between the PL and Rags. Hope Everton and Forest lawyers are all over it.

Under Premier League rules clubs cannot lose more than £105m over a three-year period and Everton and Nottingham Forest received points deductions for being in breach.

And Rags posted losses of 113 million, 29million and 115million in the 3 year period but nothing to see here of course

And note BBC have no HYS on this of course
Click to expand...
That’s the key bit….
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top