Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,489
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
drugs I thought
Roof fixed?They thought they’d took the mastermind behind City’s success and made him CEO.
They thought Ineos would change things.
Gave the manager another 200mil to spend on his Dutch fetish.
Let go of thousands of staff.
Continue to get worse.
United are fucking shit.
Special jiffy bags like he did in cycling.What does Brailsford do ?
It wasn't reckless, you are right - it was premeditated and deliberately intended to cause harm to the opposing player.
so intent was he, that he continued with it - even if you buy the "I slipped" shit. It's not like we're talking about someone who doesn't have form - he's always been a snide cheating ****.
Something to do with marginal gains in a jiffy bag.What does Brailsford do ?
Something to do with marginal gains in a jiffy bag.
Allegedly.
United think they are a club apart and above others, an institution. A club who's success comes from just being united.There is no one I can think of who could do a job for them, they could go for the untried young manager gambit, it failed them before though, and to find a diamond manager is very difficult, it's funny watching the cycle repeat, long time Rag watchers know it, one win client media and fans, say they're back, claims there is no limit too what they can achieve this season, even winning it is not out of the question, sales of Bruno duvet covers rocket Ten Hag is the new Fergie, followed by a couple of bad results, generally the last game in the cycle is the worst one, and then it starts again, at least they are consistent I will give them that
I see you've got the action completely wrong. It wasn't a studs up challenge at all it was studs down and he clipped him with his ankle so anything you mention in your post is wrong from the get goWhen you fall, over do you do a John Cleese and scrape the sole of your foot down a passer by?
Nothing to do with rivalries - when you take into account the state of play in the match, the frustration, the raised studs, the abnormal leg action, and then add in who it was - a player with form for being unsporting, acting out of frustration and a serial cheat - you get a clearer picture.
You seem intent on being overly willing to side with his excuse - as for the other pundits? There's quite a few that think it was a red - hell, even Goldbridge thought it was.
it wasn't studs show though was it as he landed with his ankle with his foot past the player with zero force in the actionBeing nuetral I can say clearly he slipped AND deliberatly tried to take the player out, with his leg raised, studs showing, made clear contact. And he apologised immediately to the player for the tackle.
What it wasnt was an attempt to play the ball, in which he slipped and accidentaly clipped the opposition player. Which seems to be what a lot of utd fans are suggesting, and their propaganda machine media.