United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bantamgaz said:
Honestly you couldnt make it up hellbent on going after well run clubs yet a blindeye is turned to piss poor run clubs ......... ...its a huge loss even if it is sustainable but hey we all know its going under that carpet
Click to expand...
If you don’t ever reduce your debts it’s not sustainable. It’s the opposite of their so-called organic growtn
 
Vienna_70 said:
When’s the trophy parade?
Click to expand...
1VvuOQ.gif
 
jrb said:
No mention of United’s losses last season and the 2 previous seasons before last season. Or the 1/2 billion pound debt.

Sly Sports, United updates.

View attachment 131423
Click to expand...
So basically the self appointed " Worlds biggest club " (TM) aren't the best supported, don't have the biggest turnover or are not the most successful ?
If any lurking Rag crayons munchers can explain why they're the biggest club in the world, I'm all ears.
As Delia Smith famously said whilst wearing her yellow and green scarf "where are you?"
 
Last edited:
Blueboy73 said:
So basically the self appointed " Worlds biggest club " (TM) aren't the best supported, have the biggest turnover or are the most successful ?
If any lurking Rag crayons munchers can explain why they're the biggest club in the world, I'm all ears.
As Delia Smith famously said whilst wearing her yellow and gold scarf "where are you?"
Click to expand...
Don’t let’s go there….


www.bbc.com

Manchester United top 2023-24 league attendances in Europe

Of all clubs in European leagues during the 2023-24 season, Manchester United had the highest total home attendance for the campaign.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
 
“it means their losses before tax over the past three seasons have amounted to £312.9 million. The club have posted five consecutive full-year losses, due in part to increased investment in the playing squad.”

You see what increased investment in the squad gets you …..

c19205ed7ff4e67bee8d35cf224cc9d4.png
 
Impeccable One said:
“it means their losses before tax over the past three seasons have amounted to £312.9 million. The club have posted five consecutive full-year losses, due in part to increased investment in the playing squad.”

You see what increased investment in the squad gets you …..

c19205ed7ff4e67bee8d35cf224cc9d4.png
Click to expand...
And the win they have achieved was with a scruffy, very late goal against Fulham

The jammy bastards.
 
I still do not understand how the Glazers can get Rag PLC to pay for the sale of their shares.
Rag PLC do not own the shares and cannot therefore sell them. Private individuals do and yet it seems Rag PLC can claim the amount spent by the Glazers on lawyers etc against PSR. Talk about bent.
 
It's baffling, they're in Europe and UEFA have FFP rules as well as the PSR domestic limitations, it's all about figures not what clubs can afford in the future, it's largely based on 3 years financial criteria.

There's seemingly no latitude from the PL or UEFA (apart from the Dippers, Chavs and Real) but how are they getting away with this? Both organisations have punished clubs for breaking the rules and it's not the first time the Rags have failed FFP.

Masters is manipulating the PL, as is Gill on the Board at the Rags and UEFA. We all know Masters is a puppet of the Rags and Dippers, there must be lawyers from other already sanctioned clubs waiting to cut the strings, it really is an unfathomable disgrace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top